DLPRF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
36.59M
EULIF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
83.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLPRF vs EULIF

Header iconDLPRF vs EULIF Comparison
Open Charts DLPRF vs EULIFBanner chart's image
DLP RES
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization36.59M
EUROPEAN LITHIUM
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization83.99M
DLPRF vs EULIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DLPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EULIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLPRF vs. EULIF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLPRF is a Hold and EULIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DLPRF: $0.26 vs. EULIF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: DLPRF and EULIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLPRF: 100% vs. EULIF: 303%
Market capitalization -- DLPRF: $36.59M vs. EULIF: $83.99M
DLPRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $36.59M. EULIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $83.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEULIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EULIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EULIF is a better buy in the long-term than DLPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLPRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EULIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DLPRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • EULIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DLPRF is a better buy in the short-term than EULIF.

Price Growth

DLPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EULIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -20.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EULIF($84M) has a higher market cap than DLPRF($36.6M). EULIF YTD gains are higher at: 206.500 vs. DLPRF (124.024).
DLPRFEULIFDLPRF / EULIF
Capitalization36.6M84M44%
EBITDA-6.81MN/A-
Gain YTD124.024206.50060%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.38MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLPRFEULIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EULIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOIVF5.480.06
+1.09%
Bollore Investissement
CDGXF0.03N/A
N/A
China Dongxiang Group Co., Ltd.
MLXSF77.66N/A
N/A
Melexis NV
RTEZ70.00N/A
N/A
Rest EZ, Inc.
LEMIF0.15N/A
-0.28%
Leading Edge Materials Corp.

DLPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPRF and TCVNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPRF and TCVNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLPRF
1D Price
Change %
DLPRF100%
N/A
TCVNF - DLPRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRMF - DLPRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+46.15%
EULIF - DLPRF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
NVLHF - DLPRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
ELMTF - DLPRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EULIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EULIF and SRAFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EULIF and SRAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EULIF
1D Price
Change %
EULIF100%
-6.27%
SRAFF - EULIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
SVMLF - EULIF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
KGLLF - EULIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPRF - EULIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRMF - EULIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+46.15%
More