It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEULIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DLPRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EULIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
DLPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EULIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.18%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
DLPRF | EULIF | DLPRF / EULIF | |
Capitalization | 45.9M | 77.1M | 60% |
EBITDA | -3.46M | -13.75M | 25% |
Gain YTD | -62.427 | -74.684 | 84% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 404K | 301K | 134% |
Total Debt | N/A | 844K | - |
DLPRF | EULIF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago41% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago88% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPRF and NBRFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPRF and NBRFF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DLPRF | 100% | N/A | ||
NBRFF - DLPRF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GUELF - DLPRF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TCVNF - DLPRF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BTRMF - DLPRF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
YLLXF - DLPRF | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EULIF and SRAFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EULIF and SRAFF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EULIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EULIF | 100% | -50.00% | ||
SRAFF - EULIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.28% | ||
SVMLF - EULIF | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
KGLLF - EULIF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DLPRF - EULIF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BTRMF - EULIF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |