DLPRF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
37.27M
NVLHF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
23.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLPRF vs NVLHF

Header iconDLPRF vs NVLHF Comparison
Open Charts DLPRF vs NVLHFBanner chart's image
DLP RES
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization37.27M
Nevada Lithium Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.24K
Capitalization23.57M
DLPRF vs NVLHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DLPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLPRF vs. NVLHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLPRF is a Hold and NVLHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DLPRF: $0.26 vs. NVLHF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: DLPRF and NVLHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLPRF: 126% vs. NVLHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- DLPRF: $37.27M vs. NVLHF: $23.57M
DLPRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $37.27M. NVLHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $23.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLPRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVLHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVLHF is a better buy in the long-term than DLPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLPRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVLHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DLPRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NVLHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DLPRF is a better buy in the short-term than NVLHF.

Price Growth

DLPRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NVLHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLPRF($37.3M) has a higher market cap than NVLHF($23.6M). DLPRF YTD gains are higher at: 124.024 vs. NVLHF (-46.566). NVLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.39M vs. DLPRF (-6.81M). NVLHF has more cash in the bank: 3.11M vs. DLPRF (1.38M). DLPRF (0) and NVLHF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DLPRFNVLHFDLPRF / NVLHF
Capitalization37.3M23.6M158%
EBITDA-6.81M-2.39M285%
Gain YTD124.024-46.566-266%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.38M3.11M45%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLPRFNVLHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLZNF10.99N/A
N/A
Clariant AG
JASUF0.03N/A
N/A
Jasmine International Public Co., Ltd.
KNBHF97.02N/A
N/A
Knorr Bremse Ag
OTTW15.69N/A
N/A
Ottawa Bancorp, Inc.
ORLCF0.01N/A
-17.07%
ORACLE COMMODITY HLDG CORP

DLPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPRF and NBRFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPRF and NBRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLPRF
1D Price
Change %
DLPRF100%
N/A
NBRFF - DLPRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - DLPRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
BTRMF - DLPRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EULIF - DLPRF
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.62%
NVLHF - DLPRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
More

NVLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVLHF and PGZFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVLHF and PGZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVLHF
1D Price
Change %
NVLHF100%
-4.30%
PGZFF - NVLHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
VALE - NVLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BHSIF - NVLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.04%
TGOLF - NVLHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLRF - NVLHF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More