DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 3.058 | 5.244 | 58% |
Net Assets | 921M | 329M | 280% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 51.00 | 34.00 | 150% |
Yield | 3.94 | 5.53 | 71% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 5 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | +0.19% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
APAM - FYLD | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
RIO - FYLD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |