DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 3.415 | 3.610 | 95% |
Net Assets | 900M | 308M | 292% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 51.00 | 34.00 | 150% |
Yield | 3.94 | 5.53 | 71% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago85% | 6 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 4 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | +0.15% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
APAM - FYLD | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
RIO - FYLD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More |