DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 29.547 | 27.275 | 108% |
Net Assets | 1.04B | 458M | 226% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.59 | 98% |
Turnover | 41.00 | 52.00 | 79% |
Yield | 3.87 | 4.14 | 93% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 16 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 2 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | -0.99% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
SHEL - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
TTE - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 67% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
CNQ - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More |