DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 0.478 | -3.103 | -15% |
Net Assets | 820M | 295M | 278% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.59 | 98% |
Turnover | 36.00 | 44.00 | 82% |
Yield | 4.10 | 4.35 | 94% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 18 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago77% | 4 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | -2.71% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 73% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -6.43% | ||
CVE - FYLD | 66% Closely correlated | -7.58% | ||
MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.52% | ||
More |