DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 27.812 | 25.182 | 110% |
Net Assets | 1.03B | 446M | 230% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.59 | 98% |
Turnover | 41.00 | 52.00 | 79% |
Yield | 3.79 | 2.88 | 132% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 15 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 3 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | +0.81% | ||
BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
TTE - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
RIO - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More |