It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLTTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNILY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNILY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
DLTTF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNILY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
DLTTF | MNILY | DLTTF / MNILY | |
Capitalization | 1.05B | 5.27B | 20% |
EBITDA | 210M | 39.1B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -4.687 | -19.080 | 25% |
P/E Ratio | 7.59 | 30.49 | 25% |
Revenue | 558M | 131B | 0% |
Total Cash | N/A | 23B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 199B | - |
DLTTF | MNILY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DLTTF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MNILY (29). This means that DLTTF’s stock grew similarly to MNILY’s over the last 12 months.
DLTTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNILY (100). This means that DLTTF’s stock grew similarly to MNILY’s over the last 12 months.
MNILY's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as DLTTF (89). This means that MNILY’s stock grew similarly to DLTTF’s over the last 12 months.
DLTTF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MNILY (76). This means that DLTTF’s stock grew similarly to MNILY’s over the last 12 months.
MNILY's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DLTTF (57). This means that MNILY’s stock grew similarly to DLTTF’s over the last 12 months.
DLTTF | MNILY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago25% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago21% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago4% | 2 days ago8% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago4% | 2 days ago8% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago55% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MVGJX | 16.73 | -0.06 | -0.36% |
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R1 | |||
ESECX | 31.57 | -0.13 | -0.41% |
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq C | |||
UGLSX | 87.20 | -0.47 | -0.54% |
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6 | |||
VICCX | 19.51 | -0.14 | -0.71% |
USA Mutuals Vice C | |||
JDVFX | 26.08 | -0.21 | -0.80% |
JHancock Disciplined Value R4 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLTTF and HKSHF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLTTF and HKSHF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DLTTF | 100% | N/A | ||
HKSHF - DLTTF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ICHGF - DLTTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MNILY - DLTTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HFUS - DLTTF | -0% Poorly correlated | +8.00% | ||
MAORF - DLTTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNILY has been loosely correlated with PRSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNILY jumps, then PRSI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNILY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MNILY | 100% | N/A | ||
PRSI - MNILY | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ICHGF - MNILY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HKSHF - MNILY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACRFF - MNILY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DLTTF - MNILY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |