Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$15.72
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
Volume$100
Net Assets3.4M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$37.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.16%)
Volume$130
Net Assets808.14M
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Buy and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 808M vs. DMAT (3.4M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (11.677) vs LIT (-8.877). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (3 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 11.677 | -8.877 | -132% |
| Net Assets | 3.4M | 808M | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 1.04 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +2.27% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.49% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y