Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$15.64
Change-$0.16 (-1.01%)
Volume$2.64K
CapitalizationN/A
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$43.86
Change-$0.87 (-1.95%)
Volume$301.89K
CapitalizationN/A
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongSell and LIT is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.26B vs. DMAT (5.83M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (2.052) vs LIT (-13.359). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (3 years) vs LIT (14 years). DMAT has a higher turnover LIT (19.76) vs LIT (19.76).
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.052 | -13.359 | -15% |
| Net Assets | 5.83M | 1.26B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 36.55 | 19.76 | 185% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 1.25 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.95% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 78% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 67% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
More | ||||