Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$19.26
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
Volume$5.29K
Net Assets4.39M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$44.63
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
Volume$308.11K
Net Assets1.02B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Buy and LIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.02B vs. DMAT (4.4M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (37.415) vs LIT (9.829). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 37.415 | 9.829 | 381% |
| Net Assets | 4.4M | 1.02B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.37 | 0.69 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y