Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$19.79
Change+$0.35 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.5M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$46.00
Change+$0.66 (+1.46%)
Volume$164.46K
Net Assets1.05B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and LIT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.05B vs. DMAT (4.5M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (38.700) vs LIT (13.201). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 38.700 | 13.201 | 293% |
| Net Assets | 4.5M | 1.05B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 0.65 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NRIQX | 14.94 | 0.08 | +0.54% |
| Neuberger Berman International Eq R6 | |||
| FSTSX | 20.39 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Fidelity Series International Sm Cap | |||
| LMSIX | 15.05 | -0.02 | -0.13% |
| Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity I | |||
| CMLAX | 60.54 | -0.15 | -0.25% |
| American Funds American Mutual 529A | |||
| SPUSX | 15.49 | -0.07 | -0.45% |
| Symmetry Panoramic US Equity I | |||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| HXL - DMAT | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 76% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +13.27% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||