Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs NLR
DMAT vs NLR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs NLR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$23.39
Change-$0.39 (-1.64%)
Volume$6.27K
Net Assets11.15M
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Price$121.02
Change-$1.60 (-1.30%)
Volume$1.52M
Net Assets3.39B
DMAT vs NLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. NLR commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and NLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 3.39B vs. DMAT (11.1M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: DMAT (66.918) vs NLR (48.783). DMAT was incepted earlier than NLR: DMAT (4 years) vs NLR (18 years). NLR (0.56) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). NLR has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| DMAT | NLR | DMAT / NLR | |
| Gain YTD | 66.918 | 48.783 | 137% |
| Net Assets | 11.1M | 3.39B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.56 | 105% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 36.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.40 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||