DMGGF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
64 days until earnings call
HUT
Price
$12.67
Change
-$0.23 (-1.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

DMGGF vs HUT

Header iconDMGGF vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts DMGGF vs HUTBanner chart's image
DMG Blockchain Solutions
Price$0.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Hut 8
Price$12.67
Change-$0.23 (-1.78%)
Volume$4.36M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DMGGF vs HUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
DMGGF vs. HUT commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMGGF is a Hold and HUT is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DMGGF: $0.34 vs. HUT: $12.67)
Brand notoriety: DMGGF and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMGGF: 98% vs. HUT: 106%
Market capitalization -- DMGGF: $55.03M vs. HUT: $985.18M
DMGGF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $55.03M. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $985.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than DMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMGGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than DMGGF.

Price Growth

DMGGF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +13.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

DMGGF is expected to report earnings on Dec 20, 2024.

HUT is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($985M) has a higher market cap than DMGGF($55M). HUT YTD gains are higher at: -5.022 vs. DMGGF (-21.261). DMGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.99M vs. HUT (-80.09M). HUT has more cash in the bank: 21.1M vs. DMGGF (5.06M). DMGGF has less debt than HUT: DMGGF (1.39M) vs HUT (79.5M). HUT has higher revenues than DMGGF: HUT (77M) vs DMGGF (31.9M).
DMGGFHUTDMGGF / HUT
Capitalization55M985M6%
EBITDA-7.99M-80.09M10%
Gain YTD-21.261-5.022423%
P/E RatioN/A12.84-
Revenue31.9M77M41%
Total Cash5.06M21.1M24%
Total Debt1.39M79.5M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMGGF vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
DMGGF
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8990
SMR RATING
1..100
8996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMGGF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (65). This means that DMGGF’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

DMGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (90). This means that DMGGF’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

DMGGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (96). This means that DMGGF’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (58). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMGGF (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMGGFHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

DMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMGGF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMGGF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMGGF
1D Price
Change %
DMGGF100%
+3.72%
HUT - DMGGF
67%
Closely correlated
+9.60%
HIVE - DMGGF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.60%
BTBT - DMGGF
60%
Loosely correlated
+9.27%
RIOT - DMGGF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
BITF - DMGGF
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.32%
More