DMPZF
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
DPUKY
Price
$5.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMPZF vs DPUKY

Header iconDMPZF vs DPUKY Comparison
Open Charts DMPZF vs DPUKYBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.79
Change-$0.51 (-15.45%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization1.06B
Dominos Pizza UK and IRL
Price$5.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization1.06B
DMPZF vs DPUKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMPZF vs. DPUKY commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To understand the difference between Domino`s Pizza Group Plc (DMPZF) vs. Domino`s Pizza Group Plc - ADR (DPUKY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DMPZF: $2.79 vs. DPUKY: $5.45)
Brand notoriety: DMPZF and DPUKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMPZF: 845% vs. DPUKY: 27%
Market capitalization -- DMPZF: $1.06B vs. DPUKY: $1.06B
DMPZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.06B. DPUKY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPUKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPUKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DMPZF and DPUKY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMPZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPUKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the short-term than DPUKY.

Price Growth

DMPZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -15.45% price change this week, while DPUKY (@Restaurants) price change was -16.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMPZF($1.06B) and DPUKY($1.06B) have the same market capitalization . DMPZF (10.60) and DPUKY (10.35) have similar P/E ratio . DMPZF YTD gains are higher at: -27.344 vs. DPUKY (-29.568). DPUKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 178M vs. DMPZF (162M). DMPZF (674M) and DPUKY (664M) have equivalent revenues.
DMPZFDPUKYDMPZF / DPUKY
Capitalization1.06B1.06B100%
EBITDA162M178M91%
Gain YTD-27.344-29.56892%
P/E Ratio10.6010.35102%
Revenue674M664M102%
Total Cash25.9MN/A-
Total Debt536MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMPZF vs DPUKY: Fundamental Ratings
DMPZF
DPUKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9275
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8989
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (9). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (100). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (11). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's Price Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (89). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (90). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMPZFDPUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIVDX15.55N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Large Cap Value Admin
MEMHX38.95N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R4
MSCFX29.30N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Small Cap
GCEPX9.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income P
OASGX11.58-0.02
-0.17%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.94%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

DPUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPUKY and SHMY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPUKY and SHMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPUKY
1D Price
Change %
DPUKY100%
N/A
SHMY - DPUKY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DENN - DPUKY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
DMPZF - DPUKY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-9.77%
More