DMZPY
Price
$5.82
Change
-$0.63 (-9.77%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
DPZUF
Price
$11.35
Change
+$0.15 (+1.34%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMZPY vs DPZUF

Header iconDMZPY vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts DMZPY vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$5.82
Change-$0.63 (-9.77%)
Volume$124
Capitalization1.15B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$11.35
Change+$0.15 (+1.34%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization1.15B
DMZPY vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMZPY vs. DPZUF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To understand the difference between Domino`s Pizza Enterprises Ltd - ADR (DMZPY) vs. Domino`s Pizza Enterprises Ltd (DPZUF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DMZPY: $5.82 vs. DPZUF: $11.35)
Brand notoriety: DMZPY and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMZPY: 13% vs. DPZUF: 236%
Market capitalization -- DMZPY: $1.15B vs. DPZUF: $1.15B
DMZPY [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.15B. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMZPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DMZPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DMZPY is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMZPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMZPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMZPY is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

DMZPY (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.65% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMZPY($1.15B) and DPZUF($1.15B) have the same market capitalization . DMZPY (129.69) and DPZUF (126.46) have similar P/E ratio . DMZPY YTD gains are higher at: -36.247 vs. DPZUF (-38.315). DMZPY (195M) and DPZUF (195M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . DMZPY (2.26B) and DPZUF (2.26B) have equivalent revenues.
DMZPYDPZUFDMZPY / DPZUF
Capitalization1.15B1.15B100%
EBITDA195M195M100%
Gain YTD-36.247-38.31595%
P/E Ratio129.69126.46103%
Revenue2.26B2.26B100%
Total CashN/A87.7M-
Total DebtN/A1.46B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMZPY vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
DMZPY
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6490
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (16). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (100). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (90). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (90). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (6). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMZPYDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPNPX13.35N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap Growth I R5
EISVX27.87N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock R6
VRTPX21.54N/A
N/A
Vanguard Real Estate II Index
NWHLX11.03N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs M
BAILX11.66N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Ins

DMZPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMZPY and KRUS have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMZPY and KRUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMZPY
1D Price
Change %
DMZPY100%
-9.77%
KRUS - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
DPUKY - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.77%
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-9.77%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More