DNACF
Price
$17.50
Change
+$1.15 (+7.03%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.73B
EBYH
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNACF vs EBYH

Header iconDNACF vs EBYH Comparison
Open Charts DNACF vs EBYHBanner chart's image
Dena
Price$17.50
Change+$1.15 (+7.03%)
Volume$250
Capitalization1.73B
E-Buy Home
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization2.61M
DNACF vs EBYH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNACF vs. EBYH commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and EBYH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (DNACF: $17.50 vs. EBYH: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DNACF and EBYH are both not notable
DNACF represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while EBYH is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNACF: 63% vs. EBYH: 479%
Market capitalization -- DNACF: $1.73B vs. EBYH: $2.61M
DNACF [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $1.73B. EBYH’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $2.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $137.63B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $13.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEBYH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EBYH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNACF is a better buy in the long-term than EBYH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNACF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBYH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNACF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EBYH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNACF is a better buy in the short-term than EBYH.

Price Growth

DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EBYH (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.22% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNACF($1.73B) has a higher market cap than EBYH($2.61M). EBYH YTD gains are higher at: -7.669 vs. DNACF (-20.993). EBYH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -461.74K vs. DNACF (-24.36B). EBYH has less debt than DNACF: EBYH (38K) vs DNACF (44.4B). DNACF has higher revenues than EBYH: DNACF (132B) vs EBYH (1.38K).
DNACFEBYHDNACF / EBYH
Capitalization1.73B2.61M66,296%
EBITDA-24.36B-461.74K5,275,673%
Gain YTD-20.993-7.669274%
P/E Ratio11.87N/A-
Revenue132B1.38K9,544,468,547%
Total Cash76.2BN/A-
Total Debt44.4B38K116,842,105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNACF vs EBYH: Fundamental Ratings
DNACF
EBYH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6790
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5025

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNACF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBYH (87). This means that DNACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

DNACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (90). This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

DNACF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (100). This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

DNACF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (61). This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

DNACF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (100). This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNACFEBYH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAZIX31.070.16
+0.52%
Oakmark International R6
ECEAX35.04N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
ANVIX28.51N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Large-Cap Value Fund Inst
TCELX13.00N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
TQCCX19.53N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity C

DNACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and EXSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and EXSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNACF
1D Price
Change %
DNACF100%
N/A
EXSPF - DNACF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSSWF - DNACF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PANW - DNACF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
BAND - DNACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
DAVA - DNACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.11%
More

EBYH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBYH and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBYH and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBYH
1D Price
Change %
EBYH100%
N/A
FBSFF - EBYH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRT - EBYH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVWD - EBYH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGNOF - EBYH
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
DNACF - EBYH
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More