DNACF
Price
$16.75
Change
+$0.05 (+0.30%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
PSSWF
Price
$23.79
Change
-$1.59 (-6.26%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

DNACF vs PSSWF

Header iconDNACF vs PSSWF Comparison
Open Charts DNACF vs PSSWFBanner chart's image
Dena
Price$16.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
Volume$10
CapitalizationN/A
PSI SOFTWARE AG
Price$23.79
Change-$1.59 (-6.26%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
DNACF vs PSSWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNACF vs. PSSWF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a StrongSell and PSSWF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DNACF: $16.75 vs. PSSWF: $23.79)
Brand notoriety: DNACF and PSSWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNACF: 34% vs. PSSWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DNACF: $1.38B vs. PSSWF: $480.59M
DNACF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.38B. PSSWF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $480.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNACF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSSWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DNACF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNACF is a better buy in the long-term than PSSWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNACF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DNACF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

DNACF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while PSSWF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNACF($1.38B) has a higher market cap than PSSWF($481M). DNACF (23.26) and PSSWF (23.09) have similar P/E ratio . DNACF YTD gains are higher at: 74.843 vs. PSSWF (-12.912). DNACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. PSSWF (22.4M). DNACF has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. PSSWF (51.5M). PSSWF has less debt than DNACF: PSSWF (22.1M) vs DNACF (45B). DNACF has higher revenues than PSSWF: DNACF (133B) vs PSSWF (251M).
DNACFPSSWFDNACF / PSSWF
Capitalization1.38B481M286%
EBITDA15.2B22.4M67,857%
Gain YTD74.843-12.912-580%
P/E Ratio23.2623.09101%
Revenue133B251M52,988%
Total Cash103B51.5M200,000%
Total Debt45B22.1M203,620%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNACF: Fundamental Ratings
DNACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNACFPSSWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYPAX53.300.06
+0.11%
Rydex Transportation H
YFSNX14.44N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Global N
IVIFX18.27-0.04
-0.22%
Delaware Ivy International Core Eq C
MIGWX29.45-0.17
-0.57%
Marsico Growth Institutional
OTFCX43.61-0.38
-0.86%
Invesco Capital Appreciation C

DNACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and RADLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and RADLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNACF
1D Price
Change %
DNACF100%
N/A
RADLF - DNACF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXSPF - DNACF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSSWF - DNACF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PANW - DNACF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
BAND - DNACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More

PSSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSSWF has been loosely correlated with EXSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSSWF jumps, then EXSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSSWF
1D Price
Change %
PSSWF100%
N/A
EXSPF - PSSWF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PANW - PSSWF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
TDOC - PSSWF
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.71%
AMPL - PSSWF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
SLVFF - PSSWF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More