Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNEMX vs RNWBX
DNEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DNEMX vs RNWBX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock N
Price$17.23
Change-$0.18 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.24M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
DNEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. DNEMX (130M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than DNEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs DNEMX (0.11). DNEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DNEMX (21 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DNEMX (1.26). DNEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNEMX: RNWBX (250) vs DNEMX (100000). DNEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.15 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. DNEMX (2.78).
| DNEMX | RNWBX | DNEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.068 | 23.046 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 50000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130M | 74.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.15 | 18.50 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.49 | 43.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.78 | 16.42 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.87 | 82.43 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement