DNL | UMMA | DNL / UMMA | |
Gain YTD | 10.920 | 12.975 | 84% |
Net Assets | 492M | 154M | 319% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.65 | 65% |
Turnover | 62.00 | 11.00 | 564% |
Yield | 2.11 | 0.84 | 252% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 4 years | - |
DNL | UMMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago79% | 11 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNL has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DNL jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UMMA | 100% | +0.41% | ||
TSM - UMMA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
ASML - UMMA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
BHP - UMMA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
SAP - UMMA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
CRH - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More |