Ad is loading...
DNLCX vs VIMSX
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
Price$45.17
Change+$0.34 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets409.02M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$67.08
Change+$0.54 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. DNLCX (409M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: VIMSX (1.46) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: DNLCX (22 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). DNLCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.46 vs. VIMSX (13.00). DNLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: DNLCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. DNLCX (-8.40). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 69.26 vs. DNLCX (17.15).
| DNLCX | VIMSX | DNLCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.17 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.17 | 1,212% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.403 | -6.578 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 409M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.40 | 4.69 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.68 | 6.45 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.15 | 69.26 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.95 | 94.51 | -21% |