Advertisement
DNPCF vs DNPLY
To understand the difference between Dai Nippon Printing Co Ltd (DNPCF) vs. Dai Nippon Printing Co Ltd - ADR (DNPLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNPCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDNPLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DNPCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DNPLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNPCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNPLY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DNPCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
- DNPLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DNPCF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DNPLY (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
DNPLY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| DNPCF | DNPLY | DNPCF / DNPLY | |
| Capitalization | 7.3B | 7.3B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 228B | 228B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -4.918 | 18.984 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.93 | 10.20 | 88% |
| Revenue | 1.44T | 1.44T | 100% |
| Total Cash | 291B | 291B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 155B | 155B | 100% |
DNPCF | DNPLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNPCF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPLY (29). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew similarly to DNPLY’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (47). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (12). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (74). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (56). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
| DNPCF | DNPLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MVAL | 34.62 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | |||
| MFSB | 25.00 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| MGOV | 20.16 | -0.05 | -0.22% |
| First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
| PCY | 20.90 | -0.10 | -0.48% |
| Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF | |||
| GDE | 49.05 | -0.42 | -0.85% |
| WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Eq Stgy ETF | |||
DNPCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNPCF and SOMLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNPCF and SOMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOMLF - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSYC - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DNPLY - DNPCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
| DIGTF - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGF - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
DNPLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNPLY has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNPLY jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNPLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNPLY | 100% | +1.97% | ||
| RGP - DNPLY | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| TOPPY - DNPLY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOMLY - DNPLY | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| DNPCF - DNPLY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGY - DNPLY | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||