DNPCF vs DNPLY
To understand the difference between Dai Nippon Printing Co Ltd (DNPCF) vs. Dai Nippon Printing Co Ltd - ADR (DNPLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNPCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNPLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DNPCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- DNPLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
| DNPCF | DNPLY | DNPCF / DNPLY | |
| Capitalization | 7.32B | 7.32B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 120B | 120B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 3.896 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 13.07 | 12.32 | 106% |
| Revenue | 1.37T | 1.37T | 100% |
| Total Cash | 268B | 268B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 137B | 137B | 100% |
DNPCF | DNPLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNPCF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPLY (29). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew similarly to DNPLY’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (69). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (10). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPCF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPLY (60). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew similarly to DNPLY’s over the last 12 months.
DNPLY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (67). This means that DNPLY’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
| DNPCF | DNPLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 27% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 24% | 12 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 20% | 12 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NGRDX | 29.73 | 0.30 | +1.02% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R6 | |||
| LEVIX | 4.11 | 0.04 | +0.98% |
| Lazard US Equity Concentrated Instl | |||
| FIDEX | 13.13 | 0.09 | +0.69% |
| Fidelity SAI Sustainable U.S. Equity Fd | |||
| MINRX | 30.96 | 0.17 | +0.55% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value R1 | |||
| IARYX | 16.81 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Invesco Real Estate Y | |||
DNPCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNPCF and SOMLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNPCF and SOMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOMLF - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| NSYC - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| DNPLY - DNPCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| DIGTF - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGF - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
More | ||||
DNPLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNPLY has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNPLY jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNPLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNPLY | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| RGP - DNPLY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| TOPPY - DNPLY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOMLY - DNPLY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DNPCF - DNPLY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGY - DNPLY | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||