Ad is loading...
DNRSF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
EMAUF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

DNRSF vs EMAUF

Header iconDNRSF vs EMAUF Comparison
Open Charts DNRSF vs EMAUFBanner chart's image
Denarius Metals
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.95K
CapitalizationN/A
EMPEROR METALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
DNRSF vs EMAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNRSF vs. EMAUF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNRSF is a Hold and EMAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DNRSF: $0.52 vs. EMAUF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: DNRSF and EMAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNRSF: 71% vs. EMAUF: 22%
Market capitalization -- DNRSF: $8.57M vs. EMAUF: $3.24M
DNRSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.57M. EMAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNRSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNRSF is a better buy in the long-term than EMAUF.

Price Growth

DNRSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.47% price change this week, while EMAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNRSF($8.57M) has a higher market cap than EMAUF($3.24M). DNRSF YTD gains are higher at: 26.829 vs. EMAUF (-22.857). DNRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -774K vs. EMAUF (-1.06M). EMAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.37M vs. DNRSF (14.8K). DNRSF (0) and EMAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DNRSFEMAUFDNRSF / EMAUF
Capitalization8.57M3.24M265%
EBITDA-774K-1.06M73%
Gain YTD26.829-22.857-117%
P/E Ratio1.11N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.8K2.37M1%
Total Debt42KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JERAX11.900.02
+0.17%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate A
SPRVX69.75-0.26
-0.37%
Sprucegrove International Eq Inv
RERHX56.20-0.55
-0.97%
American Funds Europacific Growth R5E
GSUTX70.43-1.06
-1.48%
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Inv
JGSMX22.84-0.49
-2.10%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R6

DNRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNRSF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNRSF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNRSF
1D Price
Change %
DNRSF100%
N/A
RRDMF - DNRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMEGF - DNRSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
EMAUF - DNRSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.90%
KGSSF - DNRSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYNXF - DNRSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMAUF and NESRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMAUF and NESRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMAUF
1D Price
Change %
EMAUF100%
-6.90%
NESRF - EMAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
CYNXF - EMAUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPTLF - EMAUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QDROF - EMAUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNRSF - EMAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More