Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMLX
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMLX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$22.27
Change+$0.34 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.55M
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. WCMLX (42.6M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: DNSMX (1.31) vs WCMLX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs DNSMX (500000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. DNSMX (1.78). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.03 vs. WCMLX (20.77).
| DNSMX | WCMLX | DNSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.748 | -1.866 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 42.6M | 2,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.78 | 1.94 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.81 | 24.83 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.03 | 20.77 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement