Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$14.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.7B vs. DNSVX (98.7M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.66) vs SSGSX (0.51). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.42 vs. DNSVX (-11.41). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 30.38 vs. SSGSX (22.62).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.134 | -2.972 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.7M | 5.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.51 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.41 | -9.42 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.17 | -2.83 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | 22.62 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.72 | 17.56 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement