Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$14.96
Change+$0.12 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.67M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. DNSVX (99.7M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.66) vs SSGSX (0.51). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. DNSVX (-4.29). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.335 | -2.068 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.7M | 5.82B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.51 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.29 | -1.26 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.75 | 2.38 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.89 | 29.33 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.36 | 16.52 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement