Ad is loading...
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$12.97
Change+$0.27 (+2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.32M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. DNSVX (96.3M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.70) vs SSGSX (0.52). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (20 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). DNSVX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.61 vs. DNSVX (-18.17). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. SSGSX (23.96).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.962 | -13.720 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.3M | 5.33B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.52 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.17 | -14.61 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.84 | -16.35 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.03 | 23.96 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.92 | 2.97 | -469% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers