Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.41M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.96
Change+$0.52 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. DNSVX (95.4M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.69) vs SSGSX (0.52). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.66 vs. DNSVX (-11.89). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.87 vs. SSGSX (8.79).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.042 | -8.594 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.4M | 5.55B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.52 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.89 | -9.66 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.27 | -12.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.87 | 8.79 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.05 | 8.65 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement