Advertisement
DOC vs FESNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a Buy and FESNF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FESNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FESNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DOC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FESNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DOC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -1.72% price change this week, while FESNF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
DOC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (-3.14% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| DOC | FESNF | DOC / FESNF | |
| Capitalization | 13.1B | 465M | 2,817% |
| EBITDA | 1.57B | 71.3M | 2,203% |
| Gain YTD | -2.292 | 3.773 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 78.54 | 13.99 | 561% |
| Revenue | 2.8B | 101M | 2,768% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 35.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 9.35B | 462M | 2,024% |
DOC | FESNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DOC's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FESNF (11) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
DOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FESNF (100) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (10) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
| DOC | FESNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 24% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 33% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QCOC | 22.06 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct | |||
| VRIG | 25.12 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF | |||
| DESK | 41.34 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Office and Commercial REIT ETF | |||
| MCR | 6.39 | -0.01 | -0.16% |
| MFS Charter Income Trust | |||
| JPMO | 16.86 | -0.24 | -1.40% |
| YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
FESNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FESNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FESNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MAPIF - FESNF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LNSPF - FESNF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DOC - FESNF | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
| CHTH - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| MEIYF - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||