DOC
Price
$17.86
Change
-$0.04 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
12.41B
55 days until earnings call
FESNF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
450.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DOC vs FESNF

Header iconDOC vs FESNF Comparison
Open Charts DOC vs FESNFBanner chart's image
Healthpeak Properties
Price$17.86
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
Volume$4.61M
Capitalization12.41B
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.21
Change+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Volume$9.3K
Capitalization450.75M
DOC vs FESNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOC vs. FESNF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a Buy and FESNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DOC: $17.86 vs. FESNF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: DOC and FESNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOC: 62% vs. FESNF: 139%
Market capitalization -- DOC: $12.41B vs. FESNF: $450.75M
DOC [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $12.41B. FESNF’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $450.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FESNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FESNF is a better buy in the long-term than DOC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FESNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FESNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the short-term than FESNF.

Price Growth

DOC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while FESNF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+0.01% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOC($12.4B) has a higher market cap than FESNF($451M). DOC has higher P/E ratio than FESNF: DOC (74.42) vs FESNF (15.02). FESNF YTD gains are higher at: 11.892 vs. DOC (-7.931). DOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. FESNF (71.3M). FESNF has less debt than DOC: FESNF (462M) vs DOC (9.35B). DOC has higher revenues than FESNF: DOC (2.8B) vs FESNF (101M).
DOCFESNFDOC / FESNF
Capitalization12.4B451M2,749%
EBITDA1.57B71.3M2,203%
Gain YTD-7.93111.892-67%
P/E Ratio74.4215.02495%
Revenue2.8B101M2,768%
Total CashN/A35.6M-
Total Debt9.35B462M2,024%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOC vs FESNF: Fundamental Ratings
DOC
FESNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1445
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DOC's Valuation (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FESNF (12) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

DOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FESNF (100) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

DOC's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FESNF (100) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCFESNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGOYX82.06N/A
N/A
Hartford Growth Opportunities Y
CILGX16.02N/A
N/A
Clarkston Institutional
PAILX7.88N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps C
KTRSX9.42N/A
N/A
DWS Global Income Builder S
FIUIX36.21N/A
N/A
Fidelity Telecom and Utilities

DOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOC has been closely correlated with IRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOC jumps, then IRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOC
1D Price
Change %
DOC100%
-0.22%
IRT - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
KIM - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
AVB - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
GLPI - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
FRT - DOC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
MAPIF - FESNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - FESNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOC - FESNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CHTH - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More