DOC
Price
$20.42
Change
+$0.26 (+1.29%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
38 days until earnings call
FRT
Price
$109.63
Change
+$0.68 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DOC vs FRT

Header iconDOC vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts DOC vs FRTBanner chart's image
Healthpeak Properties
Price$20.42
Change+$0.26 (+1.29%)
Volume$2.47M
CapitalizationN/A
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$109.63
Change+$0.68 (+0.62%)
Volume$429.17K
CapitalizationN/A
DOC vs FRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
DOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOC vs. FRT commentary
Jan 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a Hold and FRT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DOC: $20.42 vs. FRT: $109.63)
Brand notoriety: DOC and FRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOC: 50% vs. FRT: 64%
Market capitalization -- DOC: $13.3B vs. FRT: $8.36B
DOC [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $13.3B. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

DOC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.86% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOC($13.3B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.36B). FRT has higher P/E ratio than DOC: FRT (35.98) vs DOC (33.11). DOC YTD gains are higher at: 0.740 vs. FRT (-1.101). DOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. FRT (737M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. DOC (118M). FRT has less debt than DOC: FRT (4.69B) vs DOC (7.08B). DOC has higher revenues than FRT: DOC (2.18B) vs FRT (1.13B).
DOCFRTDOC / FRT
Capitalization13.3B8.36B159%
EBITDA1.27B737M172%
Gain YTD0.740-1.101-67%
P/E Ratio33.1135.9892%
Revenue2.18B1.13B193%
Total Cash118M251M47%
Total Debt7.08B4.69B151%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOC vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
DOC
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
8570
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DOC's Valuation (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (78). This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (85). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (56). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (85). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWO294.785.98
+2.07%
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
VNSE34.680.55
+1.63%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
DGT132.800.78
+0.59%
SPDR® Global Dow ETF
LCLG53.20N/A
N/A
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
IBDX24.54-0.06
-0.24%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.62%
REG - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
KIM - FRT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
BRX - FRT
79%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
KRG - FRT
79%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
RPT - FRT
78%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
More