DOGZ vs HOG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOGZ is a Hold and HOG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOGZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DOGZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOGZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DOGZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DOGZ (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while HOG (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
DOGZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2022.
HOG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-3.25% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| DOGZ | HOG | DOGZ / HOG | |
| Capitalization | 13.6M | 5.97B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -4.02M | 1.06B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -38.822 | -14.518 | 267% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.19 | 8.94 | 80% |
| Revenue | 17.6M | 5.84B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 16.6M | 1.53B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 18.5M | 7.2B | 0% |
DOGZ | HOG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HOG's Valuation (28) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (67) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
HOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as DOGZ (94) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew similarly to DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
HOG's SMR Rating (57) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (93) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
DOGZ's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOG (80) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that DOGZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOG’s over the last 12 months.
HOG's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as DOGZ (100) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew similarly to DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.
| DOGZ | HOG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
DOGZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DOGZ and HOG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DOGZ and HOG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOGZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGZ | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| HOG - DOGZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| ONEW - DOGZ | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LUCK - DOGZ | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| WGO - DOGZ | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| JOUT - DOGZ | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
HOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOG has been closely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOG jumps, then BC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOG | 100% | +2.08% | ||
| BC - HOG | 67% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| PII - HOG | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| LCII - HOG | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| MBUU - HOG | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
| WGO - HOG | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.88% | ||
More | ||||