DOGZ
Price
$17.17
Change
+$0.32 (+1.90%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.55M
HOG
Price
$23.69
Change
+$0.60 (+2.60%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DOGZ vs HOG

Header iconDOGZ vs HOG Comparison
Open Charts DOGZ vs HOGBanner chart's image
Dogness (International)
Price$17.17
Change+$0.32 (+1.90%)
Volume$288.81K
Capitalization13.55M
Harley-Davidson
Price$23.69
Change+$0.60 (+2.60%)
Volume$1.66M
Capitalization5.97B
DOGZ vs HOG Comparison Chart
Loading...
DOGZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOGZ vs. HOG commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOGZ is a Buy and HOG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DOGZ: $17.17 vs. HOG: $23.69)
Brand notoriety: DOGZ: Not notable vs. HOG: Notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOGZ: 315% vs. HOG: 65%
Market capitalization -- DOGZ: $13.55M vs. HOG: $5.97B
DOGZ [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.55M. HOG’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $5.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOGZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DOGZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOG is a better buy in the long-term than DOGZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOGZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOGZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • HOG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOG is a better buy in the short-term than DOGZ.

Price Growth

DOGZ (@Recreational Products) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while HOG (@Recreational Products) price change was +5.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOGZ is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

HOG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.72% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOG($5.97B) has a higher market cap than DOGZ($13.6M). HOG has higher P/E ratio than DOGZ: HOG (8.94) vs DOGZ (7.19). HOG YTD gains are higher at: -20.834 vs. DOGZ (-62.255). HOG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. DOGZ (-4.02M). HOG has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. DOGZ (16.6M). DOGZ has less debt than HOG: DOGZ (18.5M) vs HOG (7.2B). HOG has higher revenues than DOGZ: HOG (5.84B) vs DOGZ (17.6M).
DOGZHOGDOGZ / HOG
Capitalization13.6M5.97B0%
EBITDA-4.02M1.06B-0%
Gain YTD-62.255-20.834299%
P/E Ratio7.198.9480%
Revenue17.6M5.84B0%
Total Cash16.6M1.53B1%
Total Debt18.5M7.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOGZ vs HOG: Fundamental Ratings
DOGZ
HOG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9156
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOG's Valuation (29) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (67) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.

HOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as DOGZ (100) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew similarly to DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.

HOG's SMR Rating (56) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (91) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.

DOGZ's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as HOG (82) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that DOGZ’s stock grew similarly to HOG’s over the last 12 months.

HOG's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOGZ (100) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOGZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOGZHOG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DOGZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSVM48.280.85
+1.79%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF
SPXT88.511.18
+1.35%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Technology
XSHD12.940.12
+0.94%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF
IYR92.330.33
+0.36%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
HART29.43N/A
N/A
NYLI Healthy Hearts ETF

DOGZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DOGZ and HOG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DOGZ and HOG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOGZ
1D Price
Change %
DOGZ100%
+1.90%
HOG - DOGZ
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
ONEW - DOGZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
LUCK - DOGZ
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.72%
WGO - DOGZ
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
JOUT - DOGZ
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
More

HOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOG has been closely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOG jumps, then BC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOG
1D Price
Change %
HOG100%
+2.60%
BC - HOG
75%
Closely correlated
+5.70%
PII - HOG
69%
Closely correlated
+3.47%
LCII - HOG
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
MBUU - HOG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
WGO - HOG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
More