Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DOXGX vs NBHCX
DOXGX vs NBHCX Comparison
Open Charts DOXGX vs NBHCX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets933.76M
DOXGX vs NBHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOXGX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. NBHCX (934M). DOXGX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: DOXGX (1.49) vs NBHCX (0.95). DOXGX was incepted earlier than NBHCX: DOXGX (3 years) vs NBHCX (17 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than DOXGX (0.46). NBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. DOXGX (15.00). NBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DOXGX: NBHCX (1000) vs DOXGX (2500). NBHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. DOXGX (5.40).
| DOXGX | NBHCX | DOXGX / NBHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.84 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.84 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.942 | 8.557 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 934M | 11,777% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.95 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 8.53 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.06 | 1.82 | 884% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.60 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYHG | 64.78 | 0.47 | +0.72% |
| ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hdgd | |||
| SPMV | 47.99 | 0.33 | +0.69% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | |||
| MKOR | 25.67 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
| Matthews Korea Active ETF | |||
| IBDV | 21.60 | -0.08 | -0.37% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corp ETF | |||
| EPOL | 29.46 | -0.29 | -0.97% |
| iShares MSCI Poland ETF | |||