DPBSF
Price
$28.29
Change
-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
804.39M
TTBKF
Price
$10.75
Change
+$0.12 (+1.13%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
270.1M
Ad is loading...

DPBSF vs TTBKF

Header iconDPBSF vs TTBKF Comparison
Open Charts DPBSF vs TTBKFBanner chart's image
Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S
Price$28.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization804.39M
2020 BULKERS
Price$10.75
Change+$0.12 (+1.13%)
Volume$155
Capitalization270.1M
DPBSF vs TTBKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPBSF vs. TTBKF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and TTBKF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (DPBSF: $28.29 vs. TTBKF: $10.72)
Brand notoriety: DPBSF and TTBKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPBSF: 13% vs. TTBKF: 37%
Market capitalization -- DPBSF: $804.39M vs. TTBKF: $269.17M
DPBSF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $804.39M. TTBKF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $269.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTBKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTBKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DPBSF and TTBKF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TTBKF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPBSF($804M) has a higher market cap than TTBKF($270M). DPBSF has higher P/E ratio than TTBKF: DPBSF (5.34) vs TTBKF (3.22). TTBKF YTD gains are higher at: -3.254 vs. DPBSF (-3.482). DPBSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 527M vs. TTBKF (93.3M). TTBKF has less debt than DPBSF: TTBKF (110M) vs DPBSF (530M). DPBSF has higher revenues than TTBKF: DPBSF (4.04B) vs TTBKF (71.7M).
DPBSFTTBKFDPBSF / TTBKF
Capitalization804M270M298%
EBITDA527M93.3M565%
Gain YTD-3.482-3.254107%
P/E Ratio5.343.22166%
Revenue4.04B71.7M5,635%
Total Cash267MN/A-
Total Debt530M110M482%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPBSF: Fundamental Ratings
DPBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALX202.78-2.05
-1.00%
Alexander's
ZS198.56-8.41
-4.06%
Zscaler
EVGO2.91-0.14
-4.59%
EVgo
ROAD73.11-3.80
-4.94%
Construction Partners
DTST3.75-0.21
-5.30%
Data Storage Corp

DPBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPBSF has been loosely correlated with NMPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPBSF jumps, then NMPRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPBSF
1D Price
Change %
DPBSF100%
N/A
NMPRY - DPBSF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOIEF - DPBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - DPBSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
TTBKF - DPBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - DPBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

TTBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTBKF and SEMUF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTBKF and SEMUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTBKF
1D Price
Change %
TTBKF100%
N/A
SEMUF - TTBKF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITIF - TTBKF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - TTBKF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USEA - TTBKF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
HSHP - TTBKF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More