DPZ
Price
$529.68
Change
+$2.56 (+0.49%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
79 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$53.62
Change
+$3.97 (+8.00%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price DPZ vs EAT

Header iconDPZ vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs EATBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza
Price$529.68
Change+$2.56 (+0.49%)
Volume$415.51K
CapitalizationN/A
Brinker International
Price$53.62
Change+$3.97 (+8.00%)
Volume$1.42M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DPZ vs EAT Comparison Chart

Loading...

DPZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
DPZ vs. EAT commentary
May 01, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and EAT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2024
Stock price -- (DPZ: $527.13 vs. EAT: $49.66)
Brand notoriety: DPZ: Notable vs. EAT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 292% vs. EAT: 172%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $18.39B vs. EAT: $2.2B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $18.39B. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $197.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DPZ and EAT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZ is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +11.85% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +7.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.87% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DPZ with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for EAT with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZ($18.4B) has a higher market cap than EAT($2.2B). DPZ has higher P/E ratio than EAT: DPZ (34.43) vs EAT (14.52). DPZ YTD gains are higher at: 28.301 vs. EAT (15.007).
DPZEATDPZ / EAT
Capitalization18.4B2.2B838%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.30115.007189%
P/E Ratio34.4314.52237%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.09B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2781
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2588
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAT's Valuation (30) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (77). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (81). This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (40). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (88). This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DPZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENSC0.590.01
+1.51%
Ensysce Biosciences
PJT95.271.18
+1.25%
PJT Partners
FTK3.500.03
+0.86%
Flotek Industries
TXO18.75N/A
N/A
TXO Partners LP
OTEX35.49-0.19
-0.53%
Open Text Corp

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
+5.62%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
WING - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
YUM - DPZ
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
EAT - DPZ
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
BJRI - DPZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More