Advertisement
DPZ vs YUM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Domino's Pizza (DPZ) vs. Yum! Brands (YUM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- DPZ recently reported weaker-than-expected Q1 results, with U.S. same-store sales at 0.9%, contributing to downward pressure on shares in recent trading sessions.
- YUM maintains relative stability ahead of its upcoming earnings, supported by strategic initiatives like menu innovation at Pizza Hut.
- YUM boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $44 billion compared to DPZ's $12 billion, reflecting broader brand diversification.
- Both stocks show quarterly revenue growth around 6%, but YUM exhibits stronger quarterly EPS (earnings per share) growth at 26.5% versus DPZ's 7.2%.
- Over the past 12 months, DPZ has underperformed with roughly -20% returns, while YUM achieved flat to modestly positive gains.
- YUM's beta of 0.66 indicates lower volatility than DPZ's 1.18, appealing to risk-averse investors.
Introduction
Domino's Pizza (DPZ) and Yum! Brands (YUM) represent key players in the quick-service restaurant sector, with DPZ specializing in pizza delivery and YUM overseeing multi-brand franchises like KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth trajectories amid shifting consumer spending patterns. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors focused on stability in consumer discretionary stocks will find value in evaluating their relative strengths, business models, and responses to recent economic pressures.
DPZ Overview and Recent Performance
Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) operates as a global pizza company emphasizing carryout and delivery, with a network of over 20,000 stores worldwide. In recent market activity, shares have faced headwinds following a Q1 earnings miss, where revenue reached $1.15 billion and EPS came in at $4.13, below expectations. U.S. same-store sales grew just 0.9%, reflecting softer demand and competitive pressures in the pizza segment. Broader sentiment has been influenced by macroeconomic caution, contributing to heightened volatility (beta 1.18) and a pullback from 52-week highs near $499. Year-to-date performance has been mixed, with recent weeks showing declines amid these results.
YUM Overview and Recent Performance
Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) is a leading multi-brand restaurant operator, franchising iconic chains including KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell across more than 57,000 locations globally. Recent performance remains relatively steady, with shares trading around $156-$160 and positive year-to-date gains of about 3.5%-6%. The company is prioritizing growth through digital enhancements and menu refreshes, particularly for Pizza Hut amid sales challenges. Quarterly revenue growth stands at 6.5%, with robust EPS expansion. Lower beta (0.66) underscores reduced market sensitivity, supporting resilience in recent weeks ahead of Q1 earnings.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML signal generation, trend following, and risk-managed virtual portfolios, operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout examples include bots with annualized returns up to +167%, win rates ranging 48%-88% (averaging ~60%), profit factors of 1.5-11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in top cases. While none currently feature DPZ or YUM, the section highlights bots excelling in volatile sectors. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your trading edge in today's markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
DPZ focuses on a streamlined pizza delivery model, driving efficiency but exposing it to segment-specific risks like same-store sales slowdowns. In contrast, YUM's diversified portfolio across chicken, Mexican, and pizza mitigates single-category vulnerabilities, fostering steadier growth drivers. Recent momentum favors YUM, with positive YTD returns versus DPZ's recent declines post-earnings. Risk profiles differ markedly: YUM's lower beta suits conservative positioning, while DPZ's higher volatility aligns with growth-oriented trades. Both face sector headwinds from consumer spending, but YUM's larger scale ($44B market cap) and franchising model provide better margin resilience. Market sentiment tilts toward YUM for stability amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward YUM over DPZ, based on superior relative performance, lower volatility (beta 0.66), stronger EPS growth, and diversified exposure. DPZ's recent earnings disappointment introduces near-term uncertainty, while YUM's stability and upcoming catalysts position it more favorably in prevailing trends. This assessment reflects observable momentum and risk-adjusted positioning rather than guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and YUM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DPZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DPZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- YUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +9.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
DPZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
YUM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (+9.39% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| DPZ | YUM | DPZ / YUM | |
| Capitalization | 10.8B | 42.5B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 1.04B | 2.89B | 36% |
| Gain YTD | -21.905 | 2.975 | -736% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.65 | 24.89 | 75% |
| Revenue | 4.98B | 8.49B | 59% |
| Total Cash | 233M | 689M | 34% |
| Total Debt | 5.14B | 12B | 43% |
DPZ | YUM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DPZ's Valuation (25) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (44). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (63). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (79). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
| DPZ | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 12 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
DPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
YUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUM | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| MCD - YUM | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| FRSH - YUM | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| DPZ - YUM | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.72% | ||
| YUMC - YUM | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| DRI - YUM | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||