DPZ
Price
$351.24
Change
-$2.48 (-0.70%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.7B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUM
Price
$152.54
Change
+$2.20 (+1.46%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.03B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs YUM

DPZ vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. YUM commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Hold and YUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (DPZ: $353.72 vs. YUM: $150.34)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 28% vs. YUM: 112%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $11.7B vs. YUM: $41.03B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $11.7B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $41.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $195.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.97% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($41B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($11.7B). DPZ has higher P/E ratio than YUM: DPZ (20.05) vs YUM (18.93). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 0.325 vs. DPZ (-14.182). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.89B vs. DPZ (1.05B). DPZ has less debt than YUM: DPZ (5.14B) vs YUM (12B). YUM has higher revenues than DPZ: YUM (8.49B) vs DPZ (5.03B).
DPZYUMDPZ / YUM
Capitalization11.7B41B29%
EBITDA1.05B2.89B36%
Gain YTD-14.1820.325-4,360%
P/E Ratio20.0518.93106%
Revenue5.03B8.49B59%
Total CashN/A689M-
Total Debt5.14B12B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8452
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZ's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (42). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (62). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (84). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTEK1.230.03
+2.50%
Maris-Tech Ltd
EBMT23.600.11
+0.47%
Eagle Bancorp Montana
PLOW42.510.07
+0.16%
Douglas Dynamics
WAB295.54-2.50
-0.84%
Wabtec
CENX48.17-4.12
-7.88%
Century Aluminum Company

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-1.01%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
WEN - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+14.70%
JACK - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
YUMC - DPZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
PTLO - DPZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.54%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+3.86%
MCD - YUM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
DPZ - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
YUMC - YUM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
DRI - YUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
More