DPZ
Price
$476.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.48B
75 days until earnings call
FAT
Price
$2.45
Change
+$0.02 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
43.98M
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs FAT

Header iconDPZ vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs FATBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$476.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$67
Capitalization16.48B
FAT Brands
Price$2.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.82%)
Volume$39.28K
Capitalization43.98M
DPZ vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. FAT commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Hold and FAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $485.53 vs. FAT: $2.45)
Brand notoriety: DPZ: Notable vs. FAT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 65% vs. FAT: 69%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $16.48B vs. FAT: $43.98M
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $16.48B. FAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $43.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DPZ and FAT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while FAT (@Restaurants) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZ($16.5B) has a higher market cap than FAT($44M). DPZ YTD gains are higher at: 16.590 vs. FAT (-17.342). DPZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. FAT (-20.55M). DPZ has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. FAT (12.2M). FAT has less debt than DPZ: FAT (1.48B) vs DPZ (5.21B). DPZ has higher revenues than FAT: DPZ (4.73B) vs FAT (583M).
DPZFATDPZ / FAT
Capitalization16.5B44M37,500%
EBITDA1.05B-20.55M-5,104%
Gain YTD16.590-17.342-96%
P/E Ratio28.20N/A-
Revenue4.73B583M812%
Total Cash304M12.2M2,492%
Total Debt5.21B1.48B351%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs FAT: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6161
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (3) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (73). This means that FAT’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (61). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (100). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (63). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZFAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFJ12.840.06
+0.47%
Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund
GDEC35.720.08
+0.22%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Dec
PRAE32.89N/A
N/A
PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF
AAVM27.17-0.03
-0.09%
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
EAPR28.33-0.04
-0.15%
Innovator Em Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF - Apr

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
+1.93%
YUM - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
QSR - DPZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CNNE - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
MCD - DPZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More