DPZUF
Price
$16.00
Change
+$0.50 (+3.23%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
GGGSF
Price
$23.90
Change
-$0.37 (-1.52%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Ad is loading...

DPZUF vs GGGSF

Header iconDPZUF vs GGGSF Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs GGGSFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$16.00
Change+$0.50 (+3.23%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.48B
Greggs
Price$23.90
Change-$0.37 (-1.52%)
Volume$224
Capitalization2.34B
DPZUF vs GGGSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. GGGSF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and GGGSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $16.00 vs. GGGSF: $23.90)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and GGGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 13% vs. GGGSF: 77%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $1.48B vs. GGGSF: $2.34B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.48B. GGGSF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DPZUF and GGGSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGGSF (@Restaurants) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.92% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($1.49B). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: DPZUF (183.46) vs GGGSF (12.36). DPZUF YTD gains are higher at: -13.043 vs. GGGSF (-30.641). GGGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 326M vs. DPZUF (195M). GGGSF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. DPZUF (87.7M). GGGSF has less debt than DPZUF: GGGSF (327M) vs DPZUF (1.46B). DPZUF has higher revenues than GGGSF: DPZUF (2.26B) vs GGGSF (1.93B).
DPZUFGGGSFDPZUF / GGGSF
Capitalization1.49B2.34B63%
EBITDA195M326M60%
Gain YTD-13.043-30.64143%
P/E Ratio183.4612.361,484%
Revenue2.26B1.93B118%
Total Cash87.7M142M62%
Total Debt1.46B327M446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs GGGSF: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
GGGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2597
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8685
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (33). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (91). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (86). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGSF (86). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UGPSX24.23N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraChina Service
GLPIX40.47N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras Inv
AATIX17.92N/A
N/A
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap I
JRSDX11.17N/A
N/A
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq D
TQAAX39.68N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq Adv

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
+3.23%
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and KRIUF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and KRIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
KRIUF - GGGSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
More