DPZUF
Price
$8.99
Change
+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
836.23M
GGGSF
Price
$20.23
Change
-$0.87 (-4.12%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs GGGSF

Header iconDPZUF vs GGGSF Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs GGGSFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$8.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Volume$361
Capitalization836.23M
Greggs
Price$20.23
Change-$0.87 (-4.12%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.11B
DPZUF vs GGGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. GGGSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and GGGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $8.68 vs. GGGSF: $20.23)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and GGGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 235% vs. GGGSF: 43%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $836.23M vs. GGGSF: $2.11B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $836.23M. GGGSF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DPZUF and GGGSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GGGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the short-term than GGGSF.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while GGGSF (@Restaurants) price change was -10.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.11B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($836M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: DPZUF (133.33) vs GGGSF (10.60). GGGSF YTD gains are higher at: -41.292 vs. DPZUF (-52.853). GGGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. DPZUF (180M). DPZUF has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. GGGSF (32.5M). GGGSF has less debt than DPZUF: GGGSF (451M) vs DPZUF (1.5B). DPZUF has higher revenues than GGGSF: DPZUF (2.3B) vs GGGSF (2.08B).
DPZUFGGGSFDPZUF / GGGSF
Capitalization836M2.11B40%
EBITDA180M359M50%
Gain YTD-52.853-41.292128%
P/E Ratio133.3310.601,258%
Revenue2.3B2.08B110%
Total Cash153M32.5M471%
Total Debt1.5B451M332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs GGGSF: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
GGGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9588
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4465

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (19). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (93). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (95). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGSF (93). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFGGGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPACX27.61N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
CLPCX13.30N/A
N/A
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity C
GCEUX101.21N/A
N/A
Green Century Equity Institutional
PRCOX65.82N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research
MGLLX16.60N/A
N/A
MFS Global Real Estate R3

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-3.50%
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.00%
JBFCF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More