DPZUF
Price
$10.27
Change
-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
926.33M
RAVE
Price
$3.39
Change
+$0.15 (+4.63%)
Updated
Aug 28, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs RAVE

Header iconDPZUF vs RAVE Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs RAVEBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$10.27
Change-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Volume$524
Capitalization926.33M
Rave Restaurant Group
Price$3.39
Change+$0.15 (+4.63%)
Volume$5.81K
Capitalization46.05M
DPZUF vs RAVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. RAVE commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Buy and RAVE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $10.27 vs. RAVE: $3.24)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and RAVE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 114% vs. RAVE: 114%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $926.33M vs. RAVE: $46.05M
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $926.33M. RAVE’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $46.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRAVE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RAVE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RAVE is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAVE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RAVE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RAVE is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а -14.35% price change this week, while RAVE (@Restaurants) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($926M) has a higher market cap than RAVE($46M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than RAVE: DPZUF (133.33) vs RAVE (17.05). RAVE YTD gains are higher at: 25.581 vs. DPZUF (-44.185). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. RAVE (3.82M). DPZUF has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. RAVE (8.72M). RAVE has less debt than DPZUF: RAVE (667K) vs DPZUF (1.46B). DPZUF has higher revenues than RAVE: DPZUF (2.26B) vs RAVE (12.2M).
DPZUFRAVEDPZUF / RAVE
Capitalization926M46M2,013%
EBITDA195M3.82M5,111%
Gain YTD-44.18525.581-173%
P/E Ratio133.3317.05782%
Revenue2.26B12.2M18,557%
Total Cash87.7M8.72M1,006%
Total Debt1.46B667K218,591%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs RAVE: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
RAVE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3577
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
9142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAVE (67) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAVE’s over the last 12 months.

RAVE's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100) in the null industry. This means that RAVE’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

RAVE's SMR Rating (42) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (91) in the null industry. This means that RAVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

RAVE's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZUF (65) in the null industry. This means that RAVE’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as RAVE (19) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to RAVE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFRAVE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMCX13.82N/A
N/A
Columbia Emerging Markets C
PGINX25.88N/A
N/A
Impax Global Environmental Markets Instl
SMSAX10.02N/A
N/A
SEI Multi Strategy Alternatives F (SIMT)
DHFIX13.96N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated I
VRTPX21.98N/A
N/A
Vanguard Real Estate II Index

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-14.35%
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.09%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More

RAVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAVE and CHSN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAVE and CHSN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAVE
1D Price
Change %
RAVE100%
-2.11%
CHSN - RAVE
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.40%
RICK - RAVE
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
DPZUF - RAVE
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.35%
DENN - RAVE
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
YUM - RAVE
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
More