DQJCY
Price
$36.70
Change
-$0.37 (-1.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
21.95B
WMMVF
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.14 (-4.68%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
51.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DQJCY vs WMMVF

Header iconDQJCY vs WMMVF Comparison
Open Charts DQJCY vs WMMVFBanner chart's image
Pan Pac
Price$36.70
Change-$0.37 (-1.00%)
Volume$14.95K
Capitalization21.95B
Wal-Mart De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.85
Change-$0.14 (-4.68%)
Volume$6.27K
Capitalization51.34B
DQJCY vs WMMVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DQJCY vs. WMMVF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DQJCY is a StrongBuy and WMMVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (DQJCY: $36.70 vs. WMMVF: $2.85)
Brand notoriety: DQJCY and WMMVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DQJCY: 64% vs. WMMVF: 26%
Market capitalization -- DQJCY: $21.95B vs. WMMVF: $51.34B
DQJCY [@Discount Stores] is valued at $21.95B. WMMVF’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $51.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $766.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $98.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DQJCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMMVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DQJCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMMVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DQJCY is a better buy in the long-term than WMMVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DQJCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMMVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DQJCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WMMVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DQJCY and WMMVF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DQJCY (@Discount Stores) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while WMMVF (@Discount Stores) price change was -6.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-1.43% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMMVF($51.3B) has a higher market cap than DQJCY($22B). DQJCY has higher P/E ratio than WMMVF: DQJCY (35.94) vs WMMVF (17.98). DQJCY YTD gains are higher at: 35.026 vs. WMMVF (9.615). DQJCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 197B vs. WMMVF (99.6B). DQJCY has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. WMMVF (32.4B). WMMVF has less debt than DQJCY: WMMVF (78.8B) vs DQJCY (487B). DQJCY has higher revenues than WMMVF: DQJCY (2.18T) vs WMMVF (991B).
DQJCYWMMVFDQJCY / WMMVF
Capitalization22B51.3B43%
EBITDA197B99.6B198%
Gain YTD35.0269.615364%
P/E Ratio35.9417.98200%
Revenue2.18T991B220%
Total Cash203B32.4B627%
Total Debt487B78.8B618%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DQJCY vs WMMVF: Fundamental Ratings
DQJCY
WMMVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3978
SMR RATING
1..100
10037
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1760
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMMVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (93). This means that WMMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMMVF (78). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

WMMVF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (100). This means that WMMVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WMMVF (58). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew similarly to WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMMVF (60). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMMVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DQJCYWMMVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOI21.360.06
+0.28%
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
VTIP50.660.09
+0.18%
Vanguard Short-Term Infl-Prot Secs ETF
SPXT99.360.18
+0.18%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Technology
PCEM10.99N/A
N/A
Polen Capital Em Mkts ex-China Gr ETF
HQGO56.55N/A
N/A
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF

DQJCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQJCY and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQJCY and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQJCY
1D Price
Change %
DQJCY100%
-1.00%
BMRRY - DQJCY
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WMMVY - DQJCY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
WMMVF - DQJCY
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
DLMAF - DQJCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%

WMMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMMVF has been loosely correlated with WMMVY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMMVF jumps, then WMMVY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMMVF
1D Price
Change %
WMMVF100%
-4.68%
WMMVY - WMMVF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BMRPF - WMMVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COST - WMMVF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
OLLI - WMMVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BMRRY - WMMVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More