Ad is loading...
DRCAX vs FKTQX
DRCAX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FKTQX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.14M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
DRCAX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FKTQX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (531M). FKTQX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FKTQX (3.81) vs DRCAX (2.80). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FKTQX (8 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FKTQX (14.01). DRCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: DRCAX (1000) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. DRCAX (1.12). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.01 vs. FKTQX (0.42).
| DRCAX | FKTQX | DRCAX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.129 | -2.610 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.81 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | 1.50 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 3.73 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | 0.42 | 962% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...