Ad is loading...
DRCMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SPCNF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

DRCMF vs SPCNF

Header iconDRCMF vs SPCNF Comparison
Open Charts DRCMF vs SPCNFBanner chart's image
Dore Copper Mining
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$21.4K
CapitalizationN/A
SPC NICKEL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35K
CapitalizationN/A
DRCMF vs SPCNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DRCMF vs. SPCNF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCMF is a Hold and SPCNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DRCMF: $0.10 vs. SPCNF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: DRCMF and SPCNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRCMF: 111% vs. SPCNF: 184%
Market capitalization -- DRCMF: $12.55M vs. SPCNF: $7.81M
DRCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.55M. SPCNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPCNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DRCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRCMF is a better buy in the long-term than SPCNF.

Price Growth

DRCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -23.66% price change this week, while SPCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DRCMF($12.6M) has a higher market cap than SPCNF($7.81M). DRCMF YTD gains are higher at: 10.132 vs. SPCNF (-49.868). SPCNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.99M vs. DRCMF (-16.3M). SPCNF has more cash in the bank: 1.46M vs. DRCMF (879K). DRCMF (0) and SPCNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DRCMFSPCNFDRCMF / SPCNF
Capitalization12.6M7.81M161%
EBITDA-16.3M-3.99M408%
Gain YTD10.132-49.868-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash879K1.46M60%
Total DebtN/A93.6K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIZAX12.710.10
+0.79%
Invesco Global Infrastructure A
ASICX25.65-0.09
-0.35%
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity C
VEMRX95.04-0.43
-0.45%
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx InsPlus
PIDIX11.54-0.06
-0.52%
Principal International EQ Index Instl
HAOYX19.56-0.20
-1.01%
Hartford International Opportunities Y

DRCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DRCMF and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRCMF and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRCMF
1D Price
Change %
DRCMF100%
-8.76%
LTRBF - DRCMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - DRCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZZTF - DRCMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
LLKKF - DRCMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-15.90%
AXVEF - DRCMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPCNF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPCNF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPCNF
1D Price
Change %
SPCNF100%
N/A
EUEMF - SPCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGNMF - SPCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - SPCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.60%
AZZTF - SPCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
DRCMF - SPCNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.76%
More