Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCVX vs PBRCX
DRCVX vs PBRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCVX vs. PBRCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCVX is a Hold and PBRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBRCX has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. DRCVX (9.64M). PBRCX pays higher dividends than DRCVX: PBRCX (12.87) vs DRCVX (1.93). DRCVX was incepted earlier than PBRCX: DRCVX (40 years) vs PBRCX (27 years). DRCVX (5.37) is less costly to investors than PBRCX (3.47). PBRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. DRCVX (133.00). DRCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBRCX: DRCVX (1000) vs PBRCX (1500). DRCVX (250) and PBRCX (250) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. DRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. PBRCX (-8.82). DRCVX return over 5 years is better than : 24.48 vs. PBRCX (-46.71).
| DRCVX | PBRCX | DRCVX / PBRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 3.36 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.37 | 3.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.644 | -10.263 | -104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1500 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 9.64M | 108M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 12.87 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | -8.82 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.15 | -34.40 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.48 | -46.71 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.99 | -76.85 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement