Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$25.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets582.36M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. DRDAX (582M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.11) vs DRDAX (0.46). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (13 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.64 vs. DRDAX (-6.70). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.37 vs. DRDAX (33.50).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.009 | 14.677 | 7% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 582M | 737B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.11 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.70 | 14.64 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 75.65 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 100.37 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.60 | 251.30 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement