Ad is loading...
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$24.65
Change+$0.47 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.69M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. DRDAX (588M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.30) vs DRDAX (0.50). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX (4.53) and DRDAX (4.34) have marching annual gain over last year. FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.51 vs. DRDAX (58.13).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | -8.490 | 12% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.30 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | 4.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.60 | 27.69 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.13 | 107.51 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.52 | 180.03 | 64% |