Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$25.76
Change+$0.21 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets605.65M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. DRDAX (606M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.12) vs DRDAX (0.44). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. DRDAX (-4.92). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.83 vs. DRDAX (37.44).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.861 | 13.832 | 21% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 723B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.12 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.92 | 14.93 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.64 | 86.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.44 | 104.83 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.79 | 259.62 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement