Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$26.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.63M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. DRDAX (632M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.20) vs DRDAX (0.49). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. DRDAX (6.61). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.10 vs. DRDAX (51.30).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.172 | 9.386 | 66% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 19.88 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.34 | 70.40 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.30 | 114.10 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.42 | 235.25 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement