Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$26.54
Change+$0.20 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.12M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. DRDAX (629M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.19) vs DRDAX (0.49). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. DRDAX (2.98). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.15 vs. DRDAX (45.92).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.931 | 10.514 | 56% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 629M | 682B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.19 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.98 | 16.47 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.71 | 59.41 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.92 | 105.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.74 | 258.98 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement