Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$26.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.44M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. DRDAX (626M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.20) vs DRDAX (0.49). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.92 vs. DRDAX (8.14). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.25 vs. DRDAX (56.21).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.528 | 7.467 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 626M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 14.92 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.34 | 71.72 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.21 | 116.25 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.58 | 233.53 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement