Ad is loading...
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$25.25
Change-$0.53 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets614.51M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 632B vs. DRDAX (615M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.23) vs DRDAX (0.83). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. DRDAX (7.29). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 144.54 vs. DRDAX (79.93).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.451 | -4.305 | -80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 615M | 632B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 11.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.59 | 39.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.93 | 144.54 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.44 | 196.84 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers