Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$25.68
Change-$0.31 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets619.5M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. DRDAX (619M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.26) vs DRDAX (0.50). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.73 vs. DRDAX (7.22). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.26 vs. DRDAX (57.79).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.397 | 3.375 | 130% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619M | 634B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 12.73 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.88 | 69.26 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.79 | 114.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.14 | 215.06 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement