Ad is loading...
DRDAX vs FXAIX
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$25.34
Change+$0.21 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets600.17M
DRDAX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. FXAIX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. DRDAX (600M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: FXAIX (1.34) vs DRDAX (0.51). DRDAX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDAX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDAX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. DRDAX (7.60). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.82 vs. DRDAX (61.21).
| DRDAX | FXAIX | DRDAX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.01 | 8,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.01 | 8,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.943 | -2.934 | -32% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 600M | 594B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.34 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 13.79 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.02 | 42.57 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.21 | 116.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.50 | 197.80 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...