Ad is loading...
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$26.17
Change-$0.09 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a StrongBuy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 585B vs. DRDCX (614M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs DRDCX (0.06). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (11 years) vs FXAIX (13 years). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.32 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.63 vs. DRDCX (23.15). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.21 vs. DRDCX (52.57).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.290 | 20.776 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 614M | 585B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 33.63 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.59 | 37.19 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.57 | 104.21 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.62 | 212.82 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...