Ad is loading...
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$24.82
Change-$0.63 (-2.48%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Hold and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 632B vs. DRDCX (619M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs DRDCX (0.06). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.32 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.40 vs. DRDCX (11.09). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.23 vs. DRDCX (42.50).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.173 | 28.550 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619M | 632B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.09 | 29.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.32 | 37.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.50 | 104.23 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.18 | 217.91 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers