Ad is loading...
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$24.39
Change+$0.15 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.05M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. DRDCX (584M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. DRDCX (5.53). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.09 vs. DRDCX (50.39).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.823 | -9.974 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 584M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 6.45 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.13 | 25.76 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.39 | 98.09 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.29 | 174.86 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers