Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$25.83
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets625.42M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. DRDCX (625M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.20) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.99 vs. DRDCX (6.98). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.41 vs. DRDCX (51.00).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.901 | 6.057 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 13.99 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 69.47 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.00 | 113.41 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.25 | 227.89 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement