Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$26.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.83M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. DRDCX (632M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.16) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. DRDCX (2.07). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.31 vs. DRDCX (41.85).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.994 | 11.505 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632M | 696B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 19.68 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.34 | 73.88 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.85 | 104.31 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.06 | 262.15 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement