Ad is loading...
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$25.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets606.03M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 619B vs. DRDCX (606M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs DRDCX (0.06). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.32 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.15 vs. DRDCX (8.46). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.81 vs. DRDCX (36.74).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.256 | 2.013 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 619B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 27.15 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.00 | 37.22 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.74 | 94.81 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.63 | 222.48 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers