Ad is loading...
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$25.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets616.47M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. DRDIX (616M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.30) vs DRDIX (0.74). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. DRDIX (8.19). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 144.41 vs. DRDIX (86.86).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.773 | -3.913 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 616M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.30 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | 9.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.55 | 29.74 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.86 | 144.41 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.51 | 197.21 | 66% |