Ad is loading...
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$24.91
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets593.04M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. DRDIX (593M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.30) vs DRDIX (0.74). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.90 vs. DRDIX (6.51). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.22 vs. DRDIX (61.50).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.039 | -5.705 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 593M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.30 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 10.90 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.33 | 38.53 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.50 | 110.22 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.62 | 185.89 | 64% |