Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$25.80
Change+$0.21 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.46M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. DRDIX (610M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.12) vs DRDIX (0.68). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. DRDIX (-3.88). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.92 vs. DRDIX (40.03).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.896 | 14.435 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 723B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.88 | 15.54 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.60 | 87.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.03 | 105.92 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.23 | 261.52 | 52% |