Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$26.08
Change-$0.13 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets621.55M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. DRDIX (622M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.16) vs DRDIX (0.71). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.50 vs. DRDIX (-0.37). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.69 vs. DRDIX (49.85).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.369 | 13.914 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 622M | 696B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.16 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 17.50 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 89.79 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.85 | 116.69 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.25 | 286.73 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement