Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$26.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets630.14M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. DRDIX (630M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.20) vs DRDIX (0.73). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. DRDIX (6.63). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.24 vs. DRDIX (52.59).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.052 | 8.947 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 630M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.20 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 19.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.89 | 69.71 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.59 | 113.24 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.32 | 233.91 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement