Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$25.51
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.73M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. DRDIX (619M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.34) vs DRDIX (0.75). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.53 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. DRDIX (6.66). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.25 vs. DRDIX (62.50).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.215 | -0.138 | -3,047% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619M | 594B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 11.58 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.27 | 53.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.50 | 113.25 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.92 | 200.51 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement