Advertisement
DREUF vs FBBPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DREUF is a Buy and FBBPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DREUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DREUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FBBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DREUF’s TA Score shows that 9 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBBPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DREUF’s TA Score: 9 bullish, 2 bearish.
- FBBPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
| DREUF | FBBPF | DREUF / FBBPF | |
| Capitalization | 2.63B | 6.12B | 43% |
| EBITDA | 319M | 23.8B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 9.235 | 32.035 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.52 | 4.84 | 342% |
| Revenue | 473M | 11.8B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 35.7M | 1.83B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 2.97B | 42.1B | 7% |
DREUF | FBBPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DREUF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (13). This means that DREUF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DREUF (85). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to DREUF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DREUF (85). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DREUF’s over the last 12 months.
DREUF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (55). This means that DREUF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DREUF (79). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DREUF’s over the last 12 months.
| DREUF | FBBPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 17 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JAMRX | 95.89 | 0.61 | +0.64% |
| Janus Henderson Research T | |||
| PAECX | 19.36 | 0.09 | +0.47% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr C | |||
| FIKLX | 10.50 | 0.04 | +0.38% |
| Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate Z | |||
| MDRFX | 21.63 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Investor A | |||
| GMJPX | 11.68 | -0.12 | -1.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities P | |||
DREUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DREUF has been loosely correlated with SRRTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DREUF jumps, then SRRTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DREUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DREUF | 100% | +2.19% | ||
| SRRTF - DREUF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| NSA - DREUF | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| IRT - DREUF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| PLYM - DREUF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| RIOCF - DREUF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
FBBPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and FESNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and FESNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBBPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBBPF | 100% | +2.75% | ||
| FESNF - FBBPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRIVF - FBBPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EFRTF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| DREUF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| FRMUF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||