DRRSF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
56.42M
ERDCF
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.01 (+1.56%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
97.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRRSF vs ERDCF

Header iconDRRSF vs ERDCF Comparison
Open Charts DRRSF vs ERDCFBanner chart's image
Arianne Phosphate
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$40.45K
Capitalization56.42M
Erdene Resource Development
Price$0.65
Change+$0.01 (+1.56%)
Volume$14.2K
Capitalization97.43M
DRRSF vs ERDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DRRSF vs. ERDCF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRRSF is a StrongBuy and ERDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DRRSF: $0.12 vs. ERDCF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: DRRSF and ERDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRRSF: 56% vs. ERDCF: 27%
Market capitalization -- DRRSF: $56.42M vs. ERDCF: $97.43M
DRRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $56.42M. ERDCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $97.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DRRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ERDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DRRSF and ERDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRRSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERDCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRRSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ERDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DRRSF is a better buy in the short-term than ERDCF.

Price Growth

DRRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.16% price change this week, while ERDCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

DRRSF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.63% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERDCF($97.4M) has a higher market cap than DRRSF($56.4M). ERDCF YTD gains are higher at: 71.704 vs. DRRSF (23.190). DRRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16M vs. ERDCF (-5.57M). ERDCF has more cash in the bank: 11.7M vs. DRRSF (5.15M). ERDCF has less debt than DRRSF: ERDCF (7M) vs DRRSF (26.1M). DRRSF (0) and ERDCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DRRSFERDCFDRRSF / ERDCF
Capitalization56.4M97.4M58%
EBITDA1.16M-5.57M-21%
Gain YTD23.19071.70432%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.15M11.7M44%
Total Debt26.1M7M373%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DRRSF vs ERDCF: Fundamental Ratings
DRRSF
ERDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRRSF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERDCF (93). This means that DRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERDCF’s over the last 12 months.

ERDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DRRSF (100). This means that ERDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

ERDCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DRRSF (96). This means that ERDCF’s stock grew similarly to DRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

ERDCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DRRSF (61). This means that ERDCF’s stock grew similarly to DRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

DRRSF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERDCF (51). This means that DRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRRSFERDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLPPF1.000.03
+3.24%
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
MTAGF2.70N/A
N/A
Ceconomy AG
SHIEF0.04N/A
N/A
Shield Therapeutics PLC
CRTIF0.08N/A
N/A
CARTIER SILVER CORP.
TOELY92.95-3.18
-3.31%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.

DRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DRRSF and DUVNF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRRSF and DUVNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRRSF
1D Price
Change %
DRRSF100%
+8.59%
DUVNF - DRRSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+21.47%
DFMTF - DRRSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.52%
ENCTF - DRRSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERDCF - DRRSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
EGPLF - DRRSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

ERDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERDCF has been loosely correlated with CSCCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERDCF jumps, then CSCCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERDCF
1D Price
Change %
ERDCF100%
+1.58%
CSCCF - ERDCF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCX - ERDCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
SCCO - ERDCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
TGB - ERDCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
HBM - ERDCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More