DRTTF vs IESC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRTTF is a Hold and IESC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DRTTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DRTTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IESC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IESC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
DRTTF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
DRTTF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.12% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DRTTF | IESC | DRTTF / IESC | |
| Capitalization | 133M | 3.8B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 25.8M | 365M | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 3.022 | -5.618 | -54% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.23 | 17.66 | 58% |
| Revenue | 174M | 3B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 29.3M | 112M | 26% |
| Total Debt | 52.3M | 41.1M | 127% |
DRTTF | IESC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 31 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DRTTF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as IESC (68) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that DRTTF’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for DRTTF (100) in the null industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than DRTTF’s over the last 12 months.
DRTTF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as IESC (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that DRTTF’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
DRTTF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as IESC (58) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that DRTTF’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
DRTTF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as IESC (72) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that DRTTF’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% |
DRTTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DRTTF and IESC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRTTF and IESC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRTTF | 100% | +2.29% | ||
| IESC - DRTTF | 26% Poorly correlated | +14.87% | ||
| AGX - DRTTF | 22% Poorly correlated | +11.37% | ||
| AMRC - DRTTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +16.49% | ||
| STN - DRTTF | 20% Poorly correlated | +8.06% | ||
| MTRX - DRTTF | 20% Poorly correlated | +8.47% | ||
More | ||||
IESC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | +14.87% | ||
| EME - IESC | 74% Closely correlated | +10.37% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 72% Closely correlated | +14.07% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 69% Closely correlated | +10.02% | ||
| PRIM - IESC | 66% Loosely correlated | +8.97% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | +17.97% | ||
More | ||||