DSEEY
Price
$8.09
Change
+$0.22 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.89B
69 days until earnings call
HKXCF
Price
$60.12
Change
+$2.75 (+4.79%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
73.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DSEEY vs HKXCF

Header iconDSEEY vs HKXCF Comparison
Open Charts DSEEY vs HKXCFBanner chart's image
Daiwa Securities Group
Price$8.09
Change+$0.22 (+2.80%)
Volume$2.06K
Capitalization10.89B
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$60.12
Change+$2.75 (+4.79%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization73.64B
DSEEY vs HKXCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DSEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSEEY vs. HKXCF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSEEY is a StrongBuy and HKXCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DSEEY: $8.09 vs. HKXCF: $60.12)
Brand notoriety: DSEEY and HKXCF are both not notable
DSEEY represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while HKXCF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSEEY: 53% vs. HKXCF: 57%
Market capitalization -- DSEEY: $10.89B vs. HKXCF: $73.64B
DSEEY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $10.89B. HKXCF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $73.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $168.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSEEY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DSEEY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the long-term than HKXCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSEEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKXCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSEEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DSEEY is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

DSEEY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +7.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

DSEEY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.31% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.03% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($73.6B) has a higher market cap than DSEEY($10.9B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than DSEEY: HKXCF (38.58) vs DSEEY (11.07). HKXCF YTD gains are higher at: 64.586 vs. DSEEY (22.390). HKXCF has less debt than DSEEY: HKXCF (1.71B) vs DSEEY (5.43T). DSEEY has higher revenues than HKXCF: DSEEY (824B) vs HKXCF (19B).
DSEEYHKXCFDSEEY / HKXCF
Capitalization10.9B73.6B15%
EBITDAN/A23.7B-
Gain YTD22.39064.58635%
P/E Ratio11.0738.5829%
Revenue824B19B4,337%
Total CashN/A247B-
Total Debt5.43T1.71B318,033%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSEEY vs HKXCF: Fundamental Ratings
DSEEY
HKXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2977
SMR RATING
1..100
135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSEEY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCF (73). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCF (77). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

DSEEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCF (35). This means that DSEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DSEEY (48). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSEEY (67). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSEEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSEEYHKXCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DSEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMID34.560.12
+0.36%
Argent Mid Cap ETF
QSPT30.540.03
+0.08%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Buffer ETF Sep
FLTR25.560.01
+0.04%
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
PBFB29.28N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Feb
NOVP29.34N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov

DSEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DSEEY has been loosely correlated with NMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DSEEY jumps, then NMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSEEY
1D Price
Change %
DSEEY100%
+2.80%
NMR - DSEEY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
JPXGY - DSEEY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
CMSQY - DSEEY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
GS - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
AAMTF - DSEEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
+4.79%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
More