DSFGY
Price
$10.40
Change
+$0.37 (+3.69%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
788.56M
DWNX
Price
$20.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

DSFGY vs DWNX

Header iconDSFGY vs DWNX Comparison
Open Charts DSFGY vs DWNXBanner chart's image
Dah Sing Financial Holdings
Price$10.40
Change+$0.37 (+3.69%)
Volume$901
Capitalization788.56M
Delhi Bank
Price$20.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.41K
CapitalizationN/A
DSFGY vs DWNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWNX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSFGY vs. DWNX commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSFGY is a Hold and DWNX is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (DSFGY: $10.40 vs. DWNX: $20.75)
Brand notoriety: DSFGY and DWNX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSFGY: 95% vs. DWNX: 696%
Market capitalization -- DSFGY: $788.56M vs. DWNX: $0
DSFGY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $788.56M. DWNX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSFGY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDWNX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DSFGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DWNX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DSFGY is a better buy in the long-term than DWNX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSFGY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DWNX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSFGY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DWNX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DWNX is a better buy in the short-term than DSFGY.

Price Growth

DSFGY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DWNX (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DWNX YTD gains are higher at: 1.199 vs. DSFGY (0.000).
DSFGYDWNXDSFGY / DWNX
Capitalization789MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0001.199-
P/E Ratio5.77N/A-
Revenue7.25BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSFGY vs DWNX: Fundamental Ratings
DSFGY
DWNX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5464
SMR RATING
1..100
779
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2663
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5041

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSFGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DWNX (100). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DWNX’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as DWNX (64). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to DWNX’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DWNX (79). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew significantly faster than DWNX’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DWNX (51). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew similarly to DWNX’s over the last 12 months.

DSFGY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWNX (63). This means that DSFGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWNX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSFGYDWNX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
9%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DSFGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWNX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIESX14.440.06
+0.42%
JPMorgan Developed International Value I
TQAIX45.080.18
+0.40%
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Sm Gr Eq I
AINIX13.990.05
+0.36%
Ariel International Institutional
GCITX13.390.04
+0.30%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Inv
CMPAX26.240.04
+0.15%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap A

DSFGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSFGY and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSFGY and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSFGY
1D Price
Change %
DSFGY100%
N/A
BKQNF - DSFGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - DSFGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGY - DSFGY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
OFED - DSFGY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DWNX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DWNX and EBKDY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DWNX and EBKDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWNX
1D Price
Change %
DWNX100%
N/A
EBKDY - DWNX
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
EFIN - DWNX
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - DWNX
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
DNKEY - DWNX
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
DSFGY - DWNX
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More