DSITF
Price
$1.46
Change
-$0.08 (-5.19%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
777.23M
JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DSITF vs JUMSF

Header iconDSITF vs JUMSF Comparison
Open Charts DSITF vs JUMSFBanner chart's image
CURRYS
Price$1.46
Change-$0.08 (-5.19%)
Volume$22.85K
Capitalization777.23M
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.07B
DSITF vs JUMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSITF vs. JUMSF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSITF is a Hold and JUMSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DSITF: $1.46 vs. JUMSF: $27.50)
Brand notoriety: DSITF and JUMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSITF: 190% vs. JUMSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DSITF: $777.23M vs. JUMSF: $4.07B
DSITF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $777.23M. JUMSF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJUMSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DSITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than DSITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSITF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DSITF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DSITF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.41% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($4.07B) has a higher market cap than DSITF($777M). JUMSF has higher P/E ratio than DSITF: JUMSF (16.00) vs DSITF (12.94). DSITF YTD gains are higher at: 23.729 vs. JUMSF (0.000). JUMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 321M vs. DSITF (-35M). JUMSF has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. DSITF (138M). JUMSF has less debt than DSITF: JUMSF (286M) vs DSITF (1.48B). DSITF has higher revenues than JUMSF: DSITF (9.83B) vs JUMSF (872M).
DSITFJUMSFDSITF / JUMSF
Capitalization777M4.07B19%
EBITDA-35M321M-11%
Gain YTD23.7290.000-
P/E Ratio12.9416.0081%
Revenue9.83B872M1,128%
Total Cash138M712M19%
Total Debt1.48B286M517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSITF vs JUMSF: Fundamental Ratings
DSITF
JUMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8014
SMR RATING
1..100
6949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5370
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9764
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DSITF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as JUMSF (27). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DSITF (80). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DSITF (69). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew similarly to DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

DSITF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as JUMSF (70). This means that DSITF’s stock grew similarly to JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSITF (97). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSITFJUMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
38%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DSITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCITX16.28N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Inv
VPMCX172.90N/A
N/A
Vanguard PRIMECAP Inv
MLPAX8.43N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha A
EQICX13.17N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Advtg C
LCISX27.11N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders I

DSITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSITF and JUMSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSITF and JUMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSITF
1D Price
Change %
DSITF100%
N/A
JUMSF - DSITF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - DSITF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFDY - DSITF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DSITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and DSITF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and DSITF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
DSITF - JUMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZSHGY - JUMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQ - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASO - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More