DSKIF
Price
$24.00
Change
-$0.83 (-3.34%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DSKIF vs EAATF

Header iconDSKIF vs EAATF Comparison
Open Charts DSKIF vs EAATFBanner chart's image
Daiseki
Price$24.00
Change-$0.83 (-3.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.67B
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization26.5M
DSKIF vs EAATF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DSKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSKIF vs. EAATF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSKIF is a Hold and EAATF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DSKIF: $24.00 vs. EAATF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: DSKIF and EAATF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSKIF: 42% vs. EAATF: 20%
Market capitalization -- DSKIF: $1.67B vs. EAATF: $26.5M
DSKIF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $1.67B. EAATF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $26.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSKIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEAATF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DSKIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EAATF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAATF is a better buy in the long-term than DSKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSKIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAATF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSKIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EAATF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAATF is a better buy in the short-term than DSKIF.

Price Growth

DSKIF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EAATF (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.71% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSKIF($1.67B) has a higher market cap than EAATF($26.5M). DSKIF YTD gains are higher at: -6.615 vs. EAATF (-35.754). DSKIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8B vs. EAATF (-1.25M). DSKIF has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. EAATF (782K). EAATF has less debt than DSKIF: EAATF (1M) vs DSKIF (5.51B). DSKIF has higher revenues than EAATF: DSKIF (62.7B) vs EAATF (0).
DSKIFEAATFDSKIF / EAATF
Capitalization1.67B26.5M6,283%
EBITDA13.8B-1.25M-1,108,220%
Gain YTD-6.615-35.75419%
P/E Ratio22.57N/A-
Revenue62.7B0-
Total Cash25.1B782K3,209,719%
Total Debt5.51B1M550,450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSKIF vs EAATF: Fundamental Ratings
DSKIF
EAATF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
6127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5995
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSKIF (74). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

DSKIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that DSKIF’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSKIF (61). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

DSKIF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (95). This means that DSKIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

DSKIF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (100). This means that DSKIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSKIFEAATF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DSKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPGCX15.28N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth C
PEGCX20.07N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth C
JHSOX25.88N/A
N/A
JHancock New Opportunities I
NFALX35.17N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Focus I
OFSFX20.75N/A
N/A
Olstein Strategic Opportunities Adviser

DSKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSKIF and GWAV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSKIF and GWAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSKIF
1D Price
Change %
DSKIF100%
N/A
GWAV - DSKIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
EAATF - DSKIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - DSKIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
GCEI - DSKIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+19.08%
TMRAF - DSKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
9%
Poorly correlated
-16.49%
GCEI - EAATF
8%
Poorly correlated
+19.08%
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - EAATF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More