DSKIF
Price
$25.70
Change
+$0.79 (+3.17%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
SECYF
Price
$10.98
Change
-$0.33 (-2.92%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

DSKIF vs SECYF

Header iconDSKIF vs SECYF Comparison
Open Charts DSKIF vs SECYFBanner chart's image
Daiseki
Price$25.70
Change+$0.79 (+3.17%)
Volume$1.55K
CapitalizationN/A
Secure Energy Services
Price$10.98
Change-$0.33 (-2.92%)
Volume$28.14K
CapitalizationN/A
DSKIF vs SECYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DSKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DSKIF vs. SECYF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSKIF is a Hold and SECYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (DSKIF: $25.70 vs. SECYF: $10.98)
Brand notoriety: DSKIF and SECYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DSKIF: 131% vs. SECYF: 156%
Market capitalization -- DSKIF: $1.67B vs. SECYF: $1.53B
DSKIF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $1.67B. SECYF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DSKIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DSKIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECYF is a better buy in the long-term than DSKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DSKIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DSKIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SECYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DSKIF is a better buy in the short-term than SECYF.

Price Growth

DSKIF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SECYF (@Environmental Services) price change was -4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.34% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DSKIF($1.67B) has a higher market cap than SECYF($1.53B). DSKIF has higher P/E ratio than SECYF: DSKIF (22.57) vs SECYF (11.75). SECYF YTD gains are higher at: 54.648 vs. DSKIF (-1.344). DSKIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8B vs. SECYF (540M). DSKIF has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. SECYF (27M). SECYF has less debt than DSKIF: SECYF (1.09B) vs DSKIF (5.51B). DSKIF has higher revenues than SECYF: DSKIF (62.7B) vs SECYF (7.86B).
DSKIFSECYFDSKIF / SECYF
Capitalization1.67B1.53B109%
EBITDA13.8B540M2,556%
Gain YTD-1.34454.648-2%
P/E Ratio22.5711.75192%
Revenue62.7B7.86B797%
Total Cash25.1B27M92,963%
Total Debt5.51B1.09B506%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSKIF vs SECYF: Fundamental Ratings
DSKIF
SECYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9110
SMR RATING
1..100
6118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SECYF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSKIF (65). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DSKIF (91). This means that SECYF’s stock grew significantly faster than DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSKIF (61). This means that SECYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

SECYF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DSKIF (55). This means that SECYF’s stock grew similarly to DSKIF’s over the last 12 months.

DSKIF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECYF (97). This means that DSKIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DSKIFSECYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DSKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRGIX6.970.13
+1.90%
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc Inst
HGOYX76.111.13
+1.51%
Hartford Growth Opportunities Y
HHDFX34.880.40
+1.16%
Hamlin High Dividend Equity Instl
FEMYX11.070.04
+0.36%
Fidelity Series Sustainable Emerg Mkts
JSCCX16.71-1.24
-6.92%
JHancock Small Cap Value R6

DSKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSKIF and GWAV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSKIF and GWAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSKIF
1D Price
Change %
DSKIF100%
N/A
GWAV - DSKIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.74%
EAATF - DSKIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - DSKIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
GCEI - DSKIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.48%
TMRAF - DSKIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More

SECYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECYF and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECYF and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECYF
1D Price
Change %
SECYF100%
-2.89%
NVRI - SECYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
CLH - SECYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
TMRAF - SECYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
DSKIF - SECYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCEI - SECYF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.48%
More