Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSMLX vs RGACX
DSMLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DSMLX vs RGACX
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
Price$66.78
Change+$0.74 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.18
Change+$1.56 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.76B
DSMLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSMLX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSMLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. DSMLX (171M). RGACX pays higher dividends than DSMLX: RGACX (0.07) vs DSMLX (0.00). DSMLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DSMLX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than DSMLX (0.89). DSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DSMLX: RGACX (250) vs DSMLX (500000). DSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.82 vs. RGACX (14.04). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. DSMLX (24.23).
| DSMLX | RGACX | DSMLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.94 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.94 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.784 | 14.155 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 14.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.90 | 48.43 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.23 | 39.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.49 | 104.21 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement