Advertisement
DT vs ESTC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dynatrace (DT) vs. Elastic (ESTC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Dynatrace (DT) and Elastic (ESTC) both operate in the observability and search analytics space, with overlapping exposure to AI-driven monitoring and data platforms.
- Over recent weeks, DT shares have shown volatility following its first-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings beat, while ESTC has delivered stronger year-to-date returns amid product updates in AI embeddings.
- Business models differ: DT emphasizes unified, AI-powered end-to-end observability, whereas ESTC focuses on scalable search and vector capabilities for enterprise data.
- Sector sentiment remains tied to broader software spending and AI adoption trends, with both companies reporting revenue growth in the mid-to-high teens recently.
- Risk factors include competition in the observability market and sensitivity to IT budget cycles for both stocks.
- Relative performance highlights ESTC’s outperformance in trailing twelve-month returns compared with DT’s more moderate gains.
Introduction
Dynatrace (DT) and Elastic (ESTC) represent two prominent players in the enterprise software sector focused on data observability, search, and analytics. Investors and traders comparing these stocks often seek insights into how their distinct approaches to AI-enhanced platforms perform amid evolving market conditions. This analysis examines recent price behavior, business fundamentals, and relative positioning to assist those evaluating software infrastructure opportunities within the technology sector.
DT Overview and Recent Performance
Dynatrace (DT) provides an AI-powered observability platform that delivers automated insights across cloud environments, applications, and infrastructure. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced fluctuations following its first-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings release, which showed revenue growth exceeding 19% year-over-year and a beat on adjusted earnings per share. Broader sentiment has been influenced by ongoing demand for AI-driven monitoring tools, though shares faced pressure post-earnings amid mixed investor reactions to forward guidance. Over recent weeks, trading volumes increased notably around the report, reflecting active positioning by market participants.
ESTC Overview and Recent Performance
Elastic (ESTC) develops search and analytics solutions built on its Elasticsearch technology, enabling organizations to manage and query large-scale data with vector and AI capabilities. Recent market activity has featured steady gains, supported by product introductions such as new multimodal embedding models. The company’s upcoming fourth-quarter and full-year fiscal 2026 earnings report, scheduled for late May, has contributed to positioning ahead of the release. Over recent weeks, the stock has maintained positive momentum relative to broader software peers, driven by continued interest in search-based AI applications.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this focused section, with available statistics often highlighting win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that can inform user selection. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, risk parameters, and ticker sets. Review the curated options on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, Dynatrace (DT) prioritizes a unified observability architecture with built-in artificial intelligence for automatic problem detection, while Elastic (ESTC) centers on flexible search infrastructure that supports diverse data types and AI workloads. Growth drivers for DT include expansion of its platform in cloud-native environments, whereas ESTC benefits from adoption of vector search and embedding technologies. Recent momentum shows ESTC delivering stronger year-to-date returns amid product momentum, contrasting with DT’s post-earnings volatility. Risk factors for both encompass competitive pressures in the observability segment and exposure to enterprise IT spending patterns. Sector exposure overlaps in software infrastructure, yet market sentiment has favored ESTC’s positioning in search AI over the trailing period.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Elastic (ESTC) due to its steadier performance trajectory and upcoming catalyst visibility. Dynatrace (DT) demonstrates solid fundamentals but has shown greater short-term price sensitivity following earnings. This assessment reflects data patterns rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DT is a Hold and ESTC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESTC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ESTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESTC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ESTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.15% price change this week, while ESTC (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
DT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
ESTC is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.46% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DT | ESTC | DT / ESTC | |
| Capitalization | 13B | 6.03B | 215% |
| EBITDA | 288M | 38.4M | 750% |
| Gain YTD | 3.299 | -23.065 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 74.93 | 17.12 | 438% |
| Revenue | 2.02B | 1.68B | 120% |
| Total Cash | 1.17B | 1.25B | 94% |
| Total Debt | 164M | 592M | 28% |
DT | ESTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESTC's Valuation (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DT (78) in the null industry. This means that ESTC’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.
ESTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DT (100) in the null industry. This means that ESTC’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.
DT's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
DT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ESTC (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
DT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESTC (49) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESTC’s over the last 12 months.
| DT | ESTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
DT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DT has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DT jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
ESTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESTC has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESTC jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESTC | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| COIN - ESTC | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLSK - ESTC | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DT - ESTC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CRM - ESTC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| TEAM - ESTC | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||