DTARF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
13.03M
MGMLF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
34.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTARF vs MGMLF

Header iconDTARF vs MGMLF Comparison
Open Charts DTARF vs MGMLFBanner chart's image
Delta Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$205K
Capitalization13.03M
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$432.67K
Capitalization34.51M
DTARF vs MGMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTARF vs. MGMLF commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTARF is a Buy and MGMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (DTARF: $0.09 vs. MGMLF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: DTARF and MGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTARF: 396% vs. MGMLF: 163%
Market capitalization -- DTARF: $13.03M vs. MGMLF: $34.51M
DTARF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.03M. MGMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $77.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DTARF and MGMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTARF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DTARF is a better buy in the short-term than MGMLF.

Price Growth

DTARF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.65% price change this week, while MGMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +38.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4558.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.05% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMLF($34.5M) has a higher market cap than DTARF($13M). MGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 103.481 vs. DTARF (2.643). MGMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.4M vs. DTARF (-6.61M). MGMLF has more cash in the bank: 5.41M vs. DTARF (3.87M). DTARF (0) and MGMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DTARFMGMLFDTARF / MGMLF
Capitalization13M34.5M38%
EBITDA-6.61M-5.4M122%
Gain YTD2.643103.4813%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.87M5.41M72%
Total DebtN/A263K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTARF vs MGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
DTARF
MGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGMLF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (88). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

MGMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (100). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

MGMLF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (99). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

MGMLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DTARF (48). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew similarly to DTARF’s over the last 12 months.

DTARF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that DTARF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTARFMGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGHT1.960.14
+7.69%
8x8
ELVN20.851.01
+5.09%
Enliven Therapeutics
MTDR48.362.02
+4.36%
Matador Resources Company
HON222.835.41
+2.49%
Honeywell International
SELX0.980.01
+0.52%
Semilux International Ltd

DTARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTARF has been loosely correlated with GSISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTARF jumps, then GSISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTARF
1D Price
Change %
DTARF100%
+0.69%
GSISF - DTARF
36%
Loosely correlated
-11.06%
LGDTF - DTARF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
GSHRF - DTARF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
NESRF - DTARF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
GFIOF - DTARF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
More

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
-0.26%
GSISF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.06%
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
GGLDF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
WRLGF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.22%
DTARF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More