Ad is loading...
DTBRX vs EIBAX
DTBRX vs EIBAX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs EIBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.88B
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
DTBRX vs EIBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. EIBAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and EIBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 48.9B vs. EIBAX (2.67B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: EIBAX (5.37) vs DTBRX (4.12). DTBRX was incepted earlier than EIBAX: DTBRX (17 years) vs EIBAX (15 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than EIBAX (0.61). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: DTBRX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. DTBRX (7.56). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.28 vs. DTBRX (-0.73).
| DTBRX | EIBAX | DTBRX / EIBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.49 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.61 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.944 | 2.580 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.9B | 2.67B | 1,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 5.37 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 9.26 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.71 | 8.19 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.73 | 18.28 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.13 | 30.22 | 37% |