Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs EIBAX
DTBRX vs EIBAX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs EIBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.12
Change+$0.09 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.37B
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond I
Price$10.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3B
DTBRX vs EIBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. EIBAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and EIBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. EIBAX (3B). EIBAX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: EIBAX (5.20) vs DTBRX (4.12). DTBRX was incepted earlier than EIBAX: DTBRX (18 years) vs EIBAX (16 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than EIBAX (0.61). EIBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIBAX: DTBRX (0) vs EIBAX (1000000). EIBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. DTBRX (3.10). EIBAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.10 vs. DTBRX (-5.32).
| DTBRX | EIBAX | DTBRX / EIBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.49 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.61 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.643 | 5.066 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 3B | 1,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 5.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 5.16 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.04 | 12.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.32 | 11.10 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.33 | 36.28 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers