Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs JBFRX
DTBRX vs JBFRX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs JBFRX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.66B
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.1B
DTBRX vs JBFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. JBFRX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and JBFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 51.7B vs. JBFRX (27.1B). JBFRX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: JBFRX (4.31) vs DTBRX (4.05). DTBRX was incepted earlier than JBFRX: DTBRX (18 years) vs JBFRX (11 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JBFRX (0.72). DTBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. JBFRX (100.00). DTBRX (0) and JBFRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JBFRX (4.57) and DTBRX (4.39) have marching annual gain over last year. JBFRX return over 5 years is better than : -0.34 vs. DTBRX (-1.82).
| DTBRX | JBFRX | DTBRX / JBFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.61 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.255 | 6.768 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.7B | 27.1B | 191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.39 | 4.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.81 | 18.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.82 | -0.34 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.26 | 25.33 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers