Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs JBFRX
DTBRX vs JBFRX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs JBFRX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$11.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.84B
JHancock Bond R4
Price$13.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.22B
DTBRX vs JBFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. JBFRX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and JBFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. JBFRX (26.2B). JBFRX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: JBFRX (4.31) vs DTBRX (4.09). DTBRX was incepted earlier than JBFRX: DTBRX (18 years) vs JBFRX (10 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JBFRX (0.72). JBFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX (0) and JBFRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JBFRX (3.50) and DTBRX (3.35) have marching annual gain over last year. JBFRX return over 5 years is better than : -3.26 vs. DTBRX (-4.94).
| DTBRX | JBFRX | DTBRX / JBFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.61 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.678 | 2.944 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.8B | 26.2B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.09 | 4.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | 3.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.12 | 8.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.94 | -3.26 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.28 | 21.19 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers