Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs JHBIX
DTBRX vs JHBIX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs JHBIX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$12.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.89B
JHancock Bond I
Price$13.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.59B
DTBRX vs JHBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. JHBIX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and JHBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 49.9B vs. JHBIX (26.6B). JHBIX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: JHBIX (4.49) vs DTBRX (4.12). DTBRX was incepted earlier than JHBIX: DTBRX (18 years) vs JHBIX (24 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JHBIX (0.48). JHBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBIX: DTBRX (0) vs JHBIX (250000). JHBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. DTBRX (3.11). JHBIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.84 vs. DTBRX (-4.03).
| DTBRX | JHBIX | DTBRX / JHBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.47 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.48 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.074 | 4.402 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9B | 26.6B | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 4.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 3.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.49 | 8.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.03 | -1.84 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.04 | 24.22 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers