Ad is loading...
DTBRX vs JHBSX
DTBRX vs JHBSX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs JHBSX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$11.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.97B
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.27B
DTBRX vs JHBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. JHBSX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and JHBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. JHBSX (26.3B). JHBSX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: JHBSX (4.57) vs DTBRX (4.13). DTBRX was incepted earlier than JHBSX: DTBRX (17 years) vs JHBSX (14 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: DTBRX (0) vs JHBSX (1000000). JHBSX (6.90) and DTBRX (6.71) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.23 vs. DTBRX (-0.60).
| DTBRX | JHBSX | DTBRX / JHBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.36 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.37 | 346% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.379 | 2.366 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49B | 26.3B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 4.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 6.90 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.48 | 6.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.60 | 1.23 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.58 | 22.41 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...