Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTBRX vs JHBSX
DTBRX vs JHBSX Comparison
Open Charts DTBRX vs JHBSX
PGIM Total Return Bond R
Price$11.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.63B
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.42
Change-$0.05 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.17B
DTBRX vs JHBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTBRX vs. JHBSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTBRX is a Hold and JHBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTBRX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. JHBSX (26.2B). JHBSX pays higher dividends than DTBRX: JHBSX (4.61) vs DTBRX (4.13). DTBRX was incepted earlier than JHBSX: DTBRX (17 years) vs JHBSX (14 years). DTBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.37). JHBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. DTBRX (113.00). DTBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: DTBRX (0) vs JHBSX (1000000). JHBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.29 vs. DTBRX (3.96). JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.85 vs. DTBRX (-3.67).
| DTBRX | JHBSX | DTBRX / JHBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.36 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.37 | 346% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.231 | 2.529 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.6B | 26.2B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 4.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 4.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.68 | 11.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.67 | -0.85 | 430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.80 | 23.53 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers